UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
They’re all at it. Carragher liking a post from Evans saying City broke the rules.

He spits at kids. His opinion has no merit.

John Aldridge ruffled the hair of a forest player who scored an own goal in the semi final after forest had fully supported Liverpool post Hillsboro.

Tony Adams ran upto Aldridge on the night arsenal pipped Liverpool to the title ruffled Aldridge’s hair and said - that’s for Brian laws. I like tony Adams just for that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought UEFA decided that ETIHAD were considered a related party to City and therefore tested to see if the sponsorship deal was fair market value. As City are now top 2 teams in the world in terms of worth, I don't think anyone can say that it's not fair market value! Seems we're being punished twice for something that's already been considered by UEFA. Also, can't wait for our and Etihad's auditors to sue UEFA too!
 
Fair enough is this better
CAS will consider urgent cases.
However, the club may take it up to the time limit to go to CAS, fucking up UEFA. When the case is registered with CAS the ban is suspended, taking the wholeprocess past the start of ECL therefore, City would have to be included in next season’s competition. So even if we loose at case the ban would be delay past next season

unless we get a points deduction which purs us out of qualifying, so eligible via appeal delay, but not in it.

unless of course we do manage to somehow win it (footballwise, we are capable) this year and qualify as champions, eligible via appeal, and still be in it next year despite the ban And a points deduction. that would just be poetic, woildnt it, in this whole sorry mess.
 
I suspect there was no coincidence in the timing between the release of the CAS conclusions and then Uefa's punishment.

For me, this is all a show, not just for the peanut gallery, but for the actual clubs who have lobbied and pressed for punishment.

I remember the last time a punishment was delivered and we eventually got to hear about the deals and levels of back-channeling which took place

Call it quiet optimism or wishful thinking on my part, but CAS is exactly the public forum which still suits both City and Uefa.

Uefa have aired this from the rooftops, it has served all its purposes.

I don't believe Cerefin has come to our games by chance, nor do I believe Khaldoon has been sat idly on his hands.

Uefa can have this whole thing off their backs, once and for all.

They are all about attracting more money into the game, not taking it out.

At CAS, I will not be surprised to see where all the smoking guns are exposed, which people are implicated, how many procedural failures there have been along the way.

Even City's official response last night did not smack of City's usual MO. Yes, there are exceptional circumstances, but all the same, ours is a regime which does not air its dirty linen in public, we keep our powder dry.

A couple of other points, it's an absolute certainty that the wider media will be further emboldened to use this period to try and book end every bit of agenda and lobby for the Premier League and other clubs to try apply retrospective action of their own.

This is a period in when the club and supporters need to take record of who comes out from under those rocks.

Secondly, in terms of a direct impact to finances. I have been assured we won't feel a ripple. We recently took £390m into the group and this can be distributed across it as we see fit.

Lastly, be wary of The Athletic. They were the ones peddling we would not be punished and yet they have now come full circle, pushing the Premier League to stick the boot in.

This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.
That's a well thought out optimistic response although I don't think it's a UEFA/City plot to save UEFA's face and yet allow City to survive (although that maybe the outcome). I think UEFA had internal disagreements and their hawks won out. I do think this may play into our hands at CAS though.

City's owner's natural stance is to compromise and negotiate. They are very conservative with a small 'c' but there's no room to negotiate with UEFA. They are out to destroy us hence the response is stronger than before.

We've already seen initial responses from the media. With one or two exceptions, the glee was there for all to see. I think Simon Stone's tweet about the net closing in and discussions he had with another Premier League CEO was quite telling, and one he will regret. He let his guard down in a moment of triumph and this is exactly what City have said about the lack of due process.

Long term I am not worried. I think City must have learned some lessons. I hope that City and Sheikh Mansour drop their commitment to a self-sustaining football club. We need to go back to the infastructure spend that accompanied City's initial takeover and respond cleverly and aggressively on all fronts.

At least now City's fans will wake up from their sleep. Games had begun to lack a little meaning. I keep saying and hearing the same 4 words everywhere: We are at war. This is something that every observer will agree with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.