UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by razman, 7 Mar 2019.

?

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  1. Two-year ban upheld

    174 vote(s)
    12.2%
  2. Ban reduced to one year

    419 vote(s)
    29.3%
  3. Ban overturned and City exonerated

    774 vote(s)
    54.1%
  4. Other

    65 vote(s)
    4.5%
  1. Norman Stanley Fletcher

    Norman Stanley Fletcher

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2006
    Messages:
    244
    Location:
    People's Republic of St. Andrew, Jamaica.
    Team supported:
    MCFCOK
    When .... and that's a big "when", I actually see this letter, with all the signatories on it - then I might start giving a monkey's ... until then ....
     
  2. LGWIO

    LGWIO

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2019
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    NI
    Team supported:
    Liverpool
    Have to say I am no impressed at all with what the other clubs have done. Innocent until proven guilty, and if that means an appeal ten so be it.
    It really dos seem very very petty...and sadly once again showing its all about the money.
     
    crazyg likes this.
  3. Vic

    Vic

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2009
    Messages:
    11,220
    Why would clubs get together to do something that so blatantly supports City's case that FFP itself is a malicious attempt to stifle competition?

    Because they can't help themselves, I suppose.

    And they'll all fail FFP next season.
     
    tweety and KS55 like this.

    ADVERTISEMENT

  4. Colin Bells Boots

    Colin Bells Boots

    Joined:
    31 May 2016
    Messages:
    7,831
    If football does manage to be played anytime soon, the mood in the Entertainment Lounge with other clubs directors will be very interesting .
     
    Kenward Garg, colgate1 and Dave S like this.
  5. Bluecolin

    Bluecolin

    Joined:
    9 Oct 2009
    Messages:
    59
    And in 4 weeks time when they are all pressing for a united front in demanding from the government support in paying players wages ........... we will remember them (except SHEFFIELD Utd of course)
     
  6. paulchapo

    paulchapo

    Joined:
    23 Nov 2010
    Messages:
    16,052
    Yes it is something I have wondered for a while now. It's true teams play for professional pride but last season in particular I noticed a different approach from certain teams to ourselves and Liverpool. Burnley were a prime example. They went to Anfield and instead of their usual 11 men behind the ball approach they played an alien more expansive game, with the odd cock up thrown in. Contrast that to when they played us at their place when it was again 11 men behind the ball and superhuman efforts from every player. Wankers.
     
    chesterbells likes this.
  7. ancoats

    ancoats

    Joined:
    28 Aug 2005
    Messages:
    11,298
    i can see it now sheikh mansour pen in hand right you bastards ? your going on the list of clubs i will never do business with and will not piss on if you was on fire
    funny thing is them 10 clubs would be shitting themselves when city over turn the ban and fine. then we should take every single one of them to court and never back down

    those without sin cast first stone ? well i would love nothing more than letting them have it. and if dirt was found on them boy in taking them down would be one of the greatest days in football
     
  8. Withnail

    Withnail

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2009
    Messages:
    2,201
    I think the time has come for City to adopt a siege mentality, quite obvious apart from the Blades we are not going to get a lot of support from other PL clubs. I am sure Khaldoon is fully aware who is behind this and let's hope when the opportunity arises City have all the aces and our rivals are left in pieces and regretting their decision to try to take on City.
     
    chesterbells and paulchapo like this.
  9. ancoats

    ancoats

    Joined:
    28 Aug 2005
    Messages:
    11,298
    i can truly understand sheffield utd in all of this. they have been done over before by the EPL before. and then the so called big elite clubs united liverpool just walked in taking the 2 big names at west ham that should have never been there in the first place with the 3rd party ownership. and nothing was said and sheff utd went down and west ham got away with it ???

    i still think tevez was at united under the 3rd party ownership and something sinks ? and i read somewhere that loan players could be signed to one club only. but its clearly united only loaned him from west ham so how could that happen ??? because when city signed tevez we had to buy out any 3rd party and paid Kia" Joorabchian and then he become the players agent ???
     
  10. hedkandi

    hedkandi

    Joined:
    28 Apr 2012
    Messages:
    861
    Location:
    DC-10 :)
    your not suggesting that other clubs and the best team ever manufactured results are you?
     
    dennishasdoneit likes this.

Share This Page