Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
It seems that Uefa have made up some 'rules' but can't understand the 'rules' they've made up. Perhaps, they'll go straight to the verdict and make that up as well! WABOCs!
I’ll only watch it if he’s stroking pussies.Tolmie, you always make me feel tingly inside.
Khaldoon’s interview should be conducted with a team of lawyers behind him, with him sat in a Bond villain-esque chair. Maybe some menacing intro music.
Not seen this info in this tweet
“3 weeks ago, @mancity made 100+ page submission. In their referral CFCB say more qs need to be asked of City but, since submission, none put to club. It's 5 years exactly since 1st FFP ruling. CFCB regs say no prosecutions more than 5 years after event.”
@tolmie's hairdoo
Because they went to CAS who found in their favour...?Well we all now why PSG got away with it a few months ago.
It's an interesting point. UEFA must be looking for a way out and so must City. Both parties can't want a long drawn-out legal battle. No matter what the outcome City will be smeared in the media. I have always thought the last thing UEFA wanted was the Der Spiegel leaks.But perhaps that is the UEFA plan. Have it thrown out on a technicality and let the mud stick while showing their sponsors that they really did try.
Still a stupid idea,we support the team at ALL times and let the club take care of the restAs a cleverer person than me once said........" Sometimes you need to take the pinch."
Never lose sight of the long term goal
If WE change nothing why will anything change?
The players and club have zero doubt which side we are on.......
When all this is over that’s what we’ll be doingImagine if we had been allowed to invest what we wanted as in any other industry.
Yep,rwak,want to be investigated to try and come first for a change..
I’m 100% in agreement with you. We need to stop worrying about how the ‘evidence’ was obtained. It’s a non starter.Which is just one of the reasons why City wouldn't be this bullish about things if it relied on the evidence condemning them being inadmissable.
This is about the Etihad sponsorship and the email saying Etihad only paid £6m of the £60m.
IMO City's incontrovertible proof will be something like a cash transaction from Etihad to City for the full amount. That would prove the money - an amount allowed by UEFA in a sponsorship they've investigated and accepted - came from Etihad and after that where Etihad get their money is none of UEFA's fucking business.
It wont be a complicated legal argument that's open to interpretation because otherwise City wouldn't talk about it being open and shut.
Probably issues we’ve raised about UEFA using evidence obtained illegally
This was also under review by the Premier League.
I’d imagine they’ll be more cautious about challenging us as it’s closer to home and impacts their competition to a greater degree if they were to impose a sanction.
However, everyone must know that if we’re banned from Europe then there’s a strong chance we will absolutely dominate the league.
He should be more worried about being called as a witness and being made to tell a court who his "source" for persons close to the investigation were!
Can he avoid that question in court?
Looks like we have been backed into a corner and will have no choice but to try and clear our name
We’re not going to come through this process without some shit sticking to us.
The likelihood is that we haven’t divulged the whole story when agreeing our settlement back in 2014 , I’m sure legally we are covered which will be our standpoint
Ethically we probably have a case to answer
It also sound like UEFA have bungled the investigation
I would predict a ban which will be overturned on appeal
This will be followed by some people having to resign or risk being litigated by our expensive legal team
January cup .May I suggest the premature ejaculation cup, for those going strong at Christmas but who can't quite finish the job.
For all we know this could be the first step in a UEFA clime down. UEFA will know they are fucked but they’ll wriggle for a while but their lawyers will know the leak to the NYT has finished any semblance of a case they may have tried to concoct. We have gone for the jugular again today - it’s the lack of process that will see us see this off.