DJBusinesscake
Well-Known Member
When will we hear about this going to CAS?
What are the chances of titles being stripped?
one of my mates is a business lawyer and says hes amazed by how many hr departments dont know the law.so possibly UEFA are so crap they keep running into trouble
I foresee an outcome here of CAS over turning it and City reluctantly accepting a fine/ suspended 1 year ban or something.
UEFA have been very clever (ie slapping 2 years on) and deep down probably know that theirs a high chance of this being over turned.
We shouldn't accept anything and my hope is we are completely exonerated, however a reluctant comprise I think is the likely outcome in all of this.
Yeah thats what I am saying... the emails stated a "Royal Highness" paid the money to Etihad but it doesnt name them directly... so there's no actual proof Shiek Mansour paid it and even if there was he doesn't own Etihad although it would be dubious
Fatty? The only way you could have mislabelled me more would have been to say I had a shit mullet. I’d give you ten grand if you had a lower body fat percentage than me.
And tell me, how did Clevers saying he was posting in Liverpool break GDPR, point me out the specific clauses.
You’ve had a fucking mate son and should have simply slunk away as per.
None, imo.What are the chances of titles being stripped?
We have 8 days to accept or appealWhen will we hear about this going to CAS?
I don't always agree with Wilson but I respect him. There's something deeper going on in all of this.Good piece. And one point very telling and we should actually explore
lucrative friendlies or a new competition entered which shows uefa and its corrupt league is not needed
that would be sweet
The emails state 'HH' = High Highness = Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the ruler of Abu Dhabi .
Sheikh Mansour and all the other male members of the royal family are 'HE' = His Excellency.
On that point alone there is no validity whatsoever in claims by UEFA or the hostile media that Sheikh Mansour (or ADUG) paid Etihad's sponsorship money.
In relation to your last paragraph, it has been suggested on here that the 2 year ban may well be linked to Ceferin's attendance at the CL game last November. He may well have come to broker a deal in relation to the whole matter, and City have stood their ground and told him politely where to go. UEFA has obviously seen it's arse and gone the whole hog with the ban and fine.Thinking this through, the allegations suggest money came from Etihad and another source (as you say above, unidentified). The leaked emails are the source. If, in return, City can demonstrate through Etihad's accounts that the monies paid by Etihad tally with what we claimed then this is porbably why we are saying irrefutable. To refute the paper trail EUFA who have to allege that Eithad had falsified their accounts and have some proof beyond the hacked emails for this which, I presume, would be a very tall order for them.
I'm feeling more confident now.
The only missing link for me is why things heated up so easy (slap on wrist to a 2 year ban). I was kind of wondering what had changed. The only thing I can think of is the Messi rumours?
A source close to the City squad believes some players will want to leave if the ban is not overturned. The club’s leading names have no need to line up potential moves before the outcome of the CAS case as they know they will not be short of suitors. [
@TheAthleticUK
]
a bit concerning but understandable
The CFG CupIt will have to be a big tournament to rake us in £100m a season.
Doubt there is any truth to that. Who would leave? The majority of our player’s contract run up to and beyond the summer of 2023. Even with a ban we would be back in the CL by that point so why would anyone leave if we do not permit it?
I assume we would lodge our appeal at the first opportunity, probably tomorrow. Why wait?We have 8 days to accept or appeal