I would say no. Fair cop on its own is a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words.Wouldn't it need an "it's a" in front of it to be idiomatic?
Bugger the trumped up charges against us, this is the real substance of the debate
Have the big words gone away now and is it safe to come back out?
Fix the cigarette lighter.The day I get out of prison, my own brother picks me up in a police car.
It’s 106 miles to Chicago, we’ve got a full tank, half pack of cigarettes, it’s dark out, and we’re wearing sunglasses. Hit it.
Souness is not brave, just a very honest and thoughtful man.
@petrusha has sorted us both out ;)Wasn't it Simon Pearce a City board member
Fair play to simon stone
Also mention why external media didn't take the Ferran interview
Your guess is as good as mine.I would say no. Fair cop on its own is a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words.
They'll never get caught. They're on a mission from God.Fix the cigarette lighter.
Apparently so. I never knew that we didn’t end up putting the money in but it explains a lot
Let it go,only you are missing the whole point of him talking within legal adviceNo it didn't sail over my head - I nor the previous poster wasn't suggesting a media feeding frenzy open to all but simply a neutral journalist (even friendly ) asking the questions. The outcome (in terms of control on brief) would have largely been the same but the message would have had more credibility for those that our neutral or even sceptical (the wider public) as it would have been seen as partly emanating from a neutral / credible source not an employee. If a dentist who made a particular toothpaste or worked for a toothpaste manufacturer told you it was good / far better than others or another independent dentist who had no financial or emotional interest in the product told you the same who do you think people would tend to believe the most ?
I believe that today's announcement heralded the beginning of the end. Added to Pep's guarded remarks last night about Barca I think a lot of arses will be squeaking on Planet UEFA, including Messrs Gill & Parry who have been party to discrimination against a fellow English Club for years. The shit has really hit the fan and it's all UEFA's making. I reckon the time is fast approaching, Fellow Blues, when we'll be able to sit back with smug smiles on our faces.
The Wolf:I believe that today's announcement heralded the beginning of the end. Added to Pep's guarded remarks last night about Barca I think a lot of arses will be squeaking on Planet UEFA, including Messrs Gill & Parry who have been party to discrimination against a fellow English Club for years. The shit has really hit the fan and it's all UEFA's making. I reckon the time is fast approaching, Fellow Blues, when we'll be able to sit back with smug smiles on our faces.
Just a quick, relatively unrelated question.
If Sheik can’t own the company Eithad for them to sponsor us (like claimed), how can the Red Bull teams function?
What announcement? I’ve been busy and not kept up to date.I believe that today's announcement heralded the beginning of the end. Added to Pep's guarded remarks last night about Barca I think a lot of arses will be squeaking on Planet UEFA, including Messrs Gill & Parry who have been party to discrimination against a fellow English Club for years. The shit has really hit the fan and it's all UEFA's making. I reckon the time is fast approaching, Fellow Blues, when we'll be able to sit back with smug smiles on our faces.
They all know where the bodies are buried and they all know, they all know.
Its naive at best that UEFA and the execs of certain clubs felt they would ever get away with this in my opinion.