UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not when people are dying at the height of a pandemic,when football returns and people are tuned into it is the best time

Again, this is bullshit and you only need to think it through for 2 seconds to realise that.

If the course of the pandemic continues as it's going then roughly similar numbers will be dying from the pandemic in 4 weeks time - actually it'll probably be much worse globally if the trend in South America continues and locally if we get an inevitable relapse from countries relaxing lock downs.

If you dont want the story to coincide with a pandemic, you cant publish it for 6-12 months.
 
But someone placed the emails about us with Der Spiegel - out of the millions of emails hacked how can it be explained that the only major story Der Spiegel ran was the one on us. You can’t tell me that’s the juiciest story Pinto found? Safe for a story on Ladyboy that was already in the public domain and a few issues re the agent fees paid in the Pogbad transfer again already in the public domain.
It is interesting because a lot of other stories were published in other places about the Ronaldo rape case, Neymar's salary, and various stories about Portugese and French clubs including PSG. Der Spiegel and the UK media seemed mainly to fixate on the anti-City story which was small beer in the grand scheme of things.
 
It is interesting because a lot of other stories were published in other places about the Ronaldo rape case, Neymar's salary, and various stories about Portugese and French clubs including PSG. Der Spiegel and the UK media seemed mainly to fixate on the anti-City story which was small beer in the grand scheme of things.

For Speigel broke the Ronaldo rape story. They published the existence of the NDA and they interviewed his accuser before football leaks, and then they exposed and published the questionaire his lawyers made him fill out where he said he raped her.

So to say the didnt fixate on it is completely wrong. Without them, there is no story.
 
Last edited:
Again, this is bullshit.

Roughly similar numbers will be dying from the pandemic in 4 weeks time - actually itll probably be worse if the trend in South America continues and we get an inevitable relapse from countries relaxing lock downs.

If you dont want the story to coincide with a pandemic, you cant publish it for 6-12 months.
We had nearly a 1,000 dying every day and you think that was the time to start a war about football,we had other things to think about like the safety of the staff we employ and sorting out the support we could offer the nhs in terms of making the ground available for whatever they needed,there is a time and a place and we are talking uk not other countries,obviously
 
Again, this is bullshit and you only need to think it through for 2 seconds to realise that.

If the course of the pandemic continues as it's going then roughly similar numbers will be dying from the pandemic in 4 weeks time - actually it'll probably be much worse globally if the trend in South America continues and locally if we get an inevitable relapse from countries relaxing lock downs.

If you dont want the story to coincide with a pandemic, you cant publish it for 6-12 months.
You should change your username to never wrong.
 
We had nearly a 1,000 dying every day and you think that was the time to start a war about football,we had other things to think about like the safety of the staff we employ and sorting out the support we could offer the nhs in terms of making the ground available for whatever they needed,there is a time and a place

Karen what the fuck are you talking about.

No one is saying it should have been published when 1000 people a day were dying, this is a straw man you've invented.

If you want to reply to a post, try fucking reading it first, not reading the first line and inventing the rest.

And again....what fucking world are you living in where the safety of the staff and supporting the NHS doesn't happen in 3 weeks time when football is back? Those things are going to be ongoing concerns, so if they preclude the publishing of the "shitstorm" seeing it any time soon.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for that link. Amazing.

For all those who think Qatar is behind it, just search the words Qatar (4 matches) or PSG (32 matches) and see how many articles are on this list. And you even have articles on Neymar (9) and Mbappé (8).

City has 41 matches.

And the winner is........Monaco with 42.
You'll know more about that than I do...:)

Yep it's excellent and shows the scale of it..problem for me is lots of the English translations are no longer there and also lots of links behind paywalls which weren't there previously.
 
I believe that both PB and TH post in good faith .

It is possible that their respective sources of information don't necessarily align , but it doesn't make either of them more or less credible imo.

I suspect that most of the posters/readers on here are extremely grateful to them both for providing the information that they do, as having only the media to rely on is clearly of no fucking value due to the rag/dipper virus which has spread throughout it.
The most positive outcome would be CAS totally clearing us (no settlement or non disclosure agreement) followed by a press conference where we publically reveal the full extent of the dirty tricks campaign against us by our commercial rivals. That would mean both PB and TH would be spot-on.
 
Hypothetically we are found guilt. What then ? What I was wondering is can we mitigate that if the sponsorship money is deemed fair value even if its come from the sheik ? Have Etihad and other not all ready been deemed related party and fair value by UEFA anyway?
 
I'd suggest that releasing it while the world's in the middle of the worst crisis since WW2 isn't the best thing to do and that waiting until the football does start, when the media will be focused on it, is entirely the right thing to do. It would completely Twitter the some of Liverpool's already meaningless title win and leave them in turmoil when they should be celebrating.

The original plan would have been to start the shit storm in the lead-up to our game against them while they were close to winning the title.

The time to do it is when it hurts them the most. And that time is when they're on the verge of getting the title. Imagine the pictures of the PL trophy being delivered to Anfield at the same time that some of their senior staff are being led out in handcuffs.

Them winning the title might be a couple of months yet,the briefing yesterday made it clear football is a contact sport and it will only come back when it is safe

Just using your posts to make a point colin,totally agree with you
 
A lot of excitement being generated about a shit storm that we haven’t seen any evidence even exists.....

Nor me. And any suggestion that we have any control over the point at which someone is led away in handcuffs is pie in the sky stuff. Even if that is using artistic license and is merely a picturesque way of suggesting that someone will be charged with a criminal offence, we would have no control whatsoever of the timing. Indeed, if we sat on evidence of a crime until it suited us, the police would probably say it's too stale to investigate.

It's a lovely idea but wishful thinking in my view.
 
Hypothetically we are found guilt. What then ? What I was wondering is can we mitigate that if the sponsorship money is deemed fair value even if its come from the sheik ? Have Etihad and other not all ready been deemed related party and fair value by UEFA anyway?
There is no vacine and its still floatinng around Earth.This wont stop untill a vaccine is found
 
Having met and talked to PB twice about this now he is the one to believe
This was discussed a few weeks ago wasn’t it. I seem to remember from yourself that it’s not huge but enough to make a mark. Is this correct or bigger deal now in your understanding?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top