I binned off the Guardian podcast years ago, bunch of tossers apart from James Richardson & Tim (who’s name I forget) from Brazil
Your opinion and your entitled to it.It’s a very backward way of thinking you’ve got going on tbf.
Maybe it's just a consequence of the almost constant negative press we seem to attract, that anything approaching neutrality appears pro City?Maybe not a fan but I think he is genuinely pro City in this contest. He also has contacts inside UEFA which no doubt need to be taken into account as the end game approaches.
It's not the football podcast, it's one that covers news items from around the world.I binned off the Guardian podcast years ago, bunch of tossers apart from James Richardson & Tim (who’s name I forget) from Brazil
What about Rushdie’s opinion? Is he entitled to that too?Your opinion and your entitled to it.
Maybe not a fan but I think he is genuinely pro City in this contest. He also has contacts inside UEFA which no doubt need to be taken into account as the end game approaches.
He is.What about Rushdie’s opinion? Is he entitled to that too?
Pro Truth = Pro CityMaybe it's just a consequence of the almost constant negative press we seem to attract, that anything approaching neutrality appears pro City?
Amazing, in the light of that, that they showed no interest in enforcing their own rule. Perhaps hacking another club is not considered serious.But they should have because it's in the PL's own charter:
"We will ensure that our clubs behave with the upmost good faith and honesty to each other"
https://www.premierleague.com/about
"Any serious breach of the Rule Book results in an independent three-person tribunal sitting to hear the case, ascertain guilt and set the punishment, which can range from fines to points deductions and, in extreme cases, expulsion from the competition (this has never happened in the history of the Premier League)."