UEFA FFP investigation - CAS hearing concludes - decision expected in July

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by razman, 7 Mar 2019.

?

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

Poll closed 10 Jun 2020.
  1. Two-year ban upheld

    133 vote(s)
    11.8%
  2. Ban reduced to one year

    383 vote(s)
    34.0%
  3. Ban overturned and City exonerated

    545 vote(s)
    48.3%
  4. Other

    67 vote(s)
    5.9%
  1. George Hannah

    George Hannah

    Joined:
    19 Mar 2009
    Messages:
    17,433
    Location:
    The Barcelona of the North
    and he thoroughly deserves his assassination fatwa?
     
    SWP's back likes this.
  2. ancoats

    ancoats

    Joined:
    28 Aug 2005
    Messages:
    11,230
    i found the answer to all this shit with uefa and FFP

    if sheikh mansour buys united or liverpool does this shit ever happen in the first place with FFP NOPE case closed
     
    Dave S, peewit57 and BrianW like this.
  3. Bandofblues

    Bandofblues

    Joined:
    29 May 2019
    Messages:
    261
    Team supported:
    City
    Should have been a points deduction at the time. You do wonder whether the PL put pressure on to protect the brand.
     

    ADVERTISEMENT

  4. waspish

    waspish

    Joined:
    25 Jan 2009
    Messages:
    36,165
    Location:
    Blue Moon
    Yep you can see how Gill changed premier ffp.
     
  5. George Hannah

    George Hannah

    Joined:
    19 Mar 2009
    Messages:
    17,433
    Location:
    The Barcelona of the North
    We know the red hands in charge of the PL, both on the interview panel for their current CEO.
     
    KS55 likes this.
  6. CharliesRightPeg

    CharliesRightPeg

    Joined:
    20 Aug 2015
    Messages:
    477
    Man_City_Loyal likes this.
  7. fulabeer

    fulabeer

    Joined:
    14 Jan 2010
    Messages:
    1,201
    We might sue them. More than likely we won't.
    However, i meant there is nothing in place to stop them making false charges. They don't seem to answer to any government body.
    The only threat to them is the cost of a lengthy claim afterwards. It shouldn't be up to us to regulate their behaviour. There needs to be something in place that prevents sanctions being given without passing certain criterias first. Like going before a truly independent legal panel before punishments are given out.
    This case has proven that the press are delighting in the fact that we are guilty until proven innocent.
    It should have been, we are charged. We either accept or deny the charges. If we accept, the punishment is declared and we can appeal the punishment.
    If we deny, then it should automatically go into an independent process, that looks at boths sides fully, and rules if they have a genuine "legal" case.
    Then all this bollocks could start etc.

    As it is, nobody (like CAS) can do anything until they give their verdict. By then, some damage is already done.
     
    give it to gordon likes this.
  8. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    10,968
    Location:
    London
    Marvellous! Told you it could be done more easily.
     
    Pablo ZZZ Peroni likes this.
  9. KS55

    KS55

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2016
    Messages:
    6,552
    The change of rule is in there.
     
  10. Grassland Blue

    Grassland Blue

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2016
    Messages:
    1,959
    Location:
    Oldham
    Team supported:
    City
    Having been tried in a kangaroo court and sanction
    I am told that the dippers hacked into our e-mails (club and private).
    Not only that, but they tapped into private phone calls.
    Above all that, they were the ones who disclosed the content (probably taken out of context), to UEFA.
    I am told...
     
    hedkandi likes this.

Share This Page