Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,290
I don't think we are guilty, I just hope that still counts for something in this day and age by the time this is all over with.To be honest we are probably guilty subsiding the airline but state aid happens all the time.
Natwest still sponsor various sorting events with tax payers money, the other week there was public demand to help British steel and last year Nissan were offered millions to build a new car in the uk. Financial doping, depends how you look at it.
It’s not illegal to do this and that is probably the city stand point. It’s been declared in the company accounts for Etihad airlines and is legal and has nothing to do with uefa where the sponsors get there money!
Shame Uefa doesn’t scrutinise it’s own sponsors and ask where the money has come from and can the sponsor afford it
There is a big difference between the state of Abu Dhabi subsidising their state owned airline(via say the Crown Prince's order) and Sheikh Mansour or ADUG subsidising Etihad... Sheikh Mansour has nothing to do with Etihad and ADUG is privately owned by him alone.
The money wouldn't need to come from Sheikh Mansour, they(Abu Dhabi/Etihad) want the sponsorship, it's probably the biggest advertising space they have and they probably feel like they need it.
Does anyone know about the airline business? It would be interesting if there was another angle(not that there aren't enough already with the cartel) why certain people don't like the Etihad sponsorship. They may have been taking losses but are they gaining market space or is there a fear of that?
Last edited: