UEFA FFP investigation into 2014 filings - CAS confirm that City have appealed- Update Pg. 848

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by razman, 7 Mar 2019.

  1. bluemanchester

    bluemanchester

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2009
    Messages:
    190
    Shame Zeigler doesn't mention that there is no reason whatsoever why UEFA can't proceed now before the CAS hearing. Unless he knows they are up a creek with no paddle.
     
  2. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    8,065
    Location:
    London
    They can't stop it:

    Q "M. Leterme, do you think these allegations deserve a ban, if found true?"
    A "If proved true, then they are serious charges and a ban would be appropriate in my opinion."
    Q: "Brilliant, I have my headline."

    Leterme almost certainly hasn't said anything other than answer questions.
    A bit like when that deadline popped up that UEFA hurried to meet - it was reported in the media, but all it needed was someone to look in the UEFA regs to find out that it was important. No leak needed, and if UEFA were asked, they would have acknowledged that it was there.
     
  3. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    8,065
    Location:
    London
    Good point.

    "Could be interpreted to say" would be true.
     
    petrusha likes this.
  4. petrusha

    petrusha

    Joined:
    6 Aug 2011
    Messages:
    3,363
    Location:
    Sportswashing for Vladimir Putin

    Yes. Their content is consistent with the interpretation the Times has given. But it's misleading unless there's some statement or implication that they could be interpreted as not entailing breaches of the letter of the regulations. If Ziegler doesn't want to do so outright, then the neatest way to achieve it would be along the lines you've suggested above.
     
    MillionMilesAway likes this.
  5. bobbyowenquiff

    bobbyowenquiff

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2007
    Messages:
    2,367
    Location:
    Lancashire
    As some have suggested on here it looks increasingly like UEFA are waiting for CAS to bale them out of the hole they are in. They can't risk action against City based on a couple of dodgy emails wihout knowing the outcome of the Pinto case which will go on for years. If CAS reject the case because of a failed process then UEFA are off the hook. The only issue then will be lingering reputational damage to City which may force us to publish all our evidence. This will be a tough call for Khaldoon because I am sure we have a lot of dirt on our enemies. I suspect we will keep our powder dry unless any future action is actually taken against us. I believe we hold all the cards.
     
    laserblue, MCFCTrick and Bobbyespania like this.
  6. Centurions

    Centurions

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2012
    Messages:
    9,236
    Location:
    South India, #iamrabin
    I'm really looking forward to the apology from UEFA when CAS throw it out because I'm convinced that Khaldoon will get to write it for them word for word with the threat of further action if they refuse.
     
  7. MadchesterCity

    MadchesterCity

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2009
    Messages:
    9,844
    Sure your not the only one thinking this!
     
  8. MadchesterCity

    MadchesterCity

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2009
    Messages:
    9,844
    Agreed, question is who do you trust less the journalists, the Germans or the Politicians?
     
  9. oldius

    oldius

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2008
    Messages:
    2,266
    It would be lovely to think that we would sue The Times, in a big way.
     
    Zubrman likes this.
  10. nmc

    nmc

    Joined:
    9 Jan 2006
    Messages:
    11,417
    Location:
    Manchester
    It’ll be interesting to see if CAS reset the clock and tell UEFA - they can start again from the beginning. With our enemies urging them on... will they... will UEFA risk everything?
     

Share This Page