Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
I think the reason it is so quiet is that whoever leaked the original "guilt" and recommended ban has been absolutely bollocked and the place is in lockdown.
When(not if) CAS recommends to UEFA that this gets thrown out I'm hoping to see some heads roll(ohhh, human rights abuses) although what will more likely happen will be somebody 'leaving' UEFA for another cushy number.I think the reason it is so quiet is that whoever leaked the original "guilt" and recommended ban has been absolutely bollocked and the place is in lockdown.
Thanks for that view.Exactly. Their internal enquiry, which I'm sure we are demanding as part of our appeal, will be inconclusive but they will "know" and so will we.
They've got a bit of a problem in that they are never going to say publicly who leaked it which means an internal enquiry has to prove inconclusive. But, from experience, that means that a) information control is shown to be lax, an evidential issue in its own right or b) there's a lack of integrity at senior levels in the organisation, or, more specifically, in the investigative part of the organisation. Unless shown, otherwise, of course, it could be both.
And all this because some giddy fucker couldn't contain their excitement. Delicious.
Thanks for that view.
How do journos get away with not revealing their sources when brought to Court?
UEFA will just parry it away. (Arf arf)Exactly. Their internal enquiry, which I'm sure we are demanding as part of our appeal, will be inconclusive but they will "know" and so will we.
They've got a bit of a problem in that they are never going to say publicly who leaked it which means an internal enquiry has to prove inconclusive. But, from experience, that means that a) information control is shown to be lax, an evidential issue in its own right or b) there's a lack of integrity at senior levels in the organisation, or, more specifically, in the investigative part of the organisation. Unless shown, otherwise, of course, it could be both.
And all this because some giddy fucker couldn't contain their excitement. Delicious.
Admittedly the reporting organ(what an apt word) was the sun 'newspaper' but the following was reported on 12/06/2019, I won't include a link(sorry Ric):-
Simply because of the leaks in the past, whether they’re true or not;So, if the hold up is not CAS as this is suggesting then by default it must be UEFA. My next question is; why have they not sentence us? There can only be one reason as far as I can see and that is - if they convict us and are found to be in the wrong then watch out courts here we come and I hope UEFA have a lot of money in the bank.