UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Gaylord du Bois]

It's not from the journalists - it adds credibility to the message - for all of those who consume it (public and fans). It could have been a single independent (albeit friendly) journalist - an in-house hack doesn't do that. If your interested read about credibility of source when it comes to advertising ...

 

[marco]

I do think today's comment was very clever where we have basically said we only have a issue with the FFP investigation rather than Uefa as a whole.

It would not surprise me at all as you say if they withdraw the sanction if it really starts to look shaky.

trouble is if they do withdraw 'the brand' is damaged', city will not do a deal- UEFA withdraw we call it a day and thats not going to happen, price wise on damages could be millions then Lawyers and those big wigs i think there called baristers,as i posted earlyer the damages claim could pull the shutters down on them for good

 

[Tricky_Trev]

Who was that interview for?

Stakeholders. With some messages to UEFA in there for good measure.

 

[sir baconface]

That's only a threshold to give you a Set number of points
Other requirements are an ability to speak English and the occupation to be on a government list of ones where there is a shortage of employees.

Not entirely correct, mate. However this is a UEFA thread so let’s not sidetrack too much.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

trouble is if they do withdraw 'the brand' is damaged', city will not do a deal- UEFA withdraw we call it a day and thats not going to happen, price wise on damages could be millions then Lawyers and those big wigs i think there called baristers,as i posted earlyer the damages claim could pull the shutters down on them for good

I think City are more likely to use it as leverage for a seat at the table. Money is irrelevant, and it can be done behind closed doors.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

It's not from the journalists - it adds credibility to the message - for all of those who consume it (public and fans). It could have been a single independent (albeit friendly) journalist - an in-house hack doesn't do that. If your interested read about credibility of source when it comes to advertising ...

We aren't advertising anything ffs. It was a simple message aimed at the fans.

Seriously why do you give a fuck?

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

I don’t get the criticism of the interview at all.
It was as much as needs saying at the moment. We are keeping things tight within the club.
Even Kev interviewed after the match tonight said as much. It’s a legal matter. We can’t say much.

That message was for the fans. Im for keeping it in-house at the moment.
Let everyone else sweat about what we know or don’t know.

 

[Blue Hefner]

Probably not more but all the top clubs will have a restricted pool to get players from so if you want the best UK Nationals to complete your squad agents will smell money.

Maybe for another thread, but how does that improve anything?

 

[mattcity5]

I don't think there are any names of note on the Adjudicatory Committee, are there?

Tbh I may be over thinking things, but I think I saw 5 names mentioned that included Gill and Parry. It's possible that was for a previous judgement though, but it's certainly going to mess with transfer plans so gives others an advantage this summer.

 

[waspish]

We aren't advertising anything ffs. It was a simple message aimed at the fans.

Seriously why do you give a fuck?

Because he is looking at it from a media or Journalist point of view which I totally disagree with that interview was for the supporters mainly so the rest in the media can swivel.