UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.
It’s FACT that their sponsorship deal was overvalued by 93m based on an independent analysis versus the figure Leterme decided to go with. Whilst that’s not proof of paying Leterme off, the only logical conclusion is that Leterme was acting with PSG’s, or rather his mate Nasser Al-Khelaifa’s best interests in mind. And a likely reward for doing that would be sort form of bribe, be it money or otherwise.
 
Seems to be suggesting some compromise could be reached before CAS consider the case. Thought the headline was far-fetched, but I think it means UEFA rather than the Adjudicatory Committee is now in charge of the case rather than UEFA having power over City.
Conn must think his readers are idiots.

He says it is interesting that Soriano says,

“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.

Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.
 
Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.

Only thing we no for a fact is there sponsor was assessed and it’s fair value was calculated as 7m they ended up getting it at 100m take say half that away and they fail ffp.
 
Conn must think his readers are idiots.

He says it is interesting that Soriano says,

“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.

Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.

Not sure it's a conspiracy from Conn - he's just a bit thick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.