United Thread 2015/16

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was obviously a huge PR stunt on behalf of the club. And i think most fans of other clubs found it pathetic and laughable. Jones & Rojo who have been pretty shit, are now 'loved' by the fans for cheering on the great win against Liverpool. ooh, they're just like us, one of the lads, they love United, yada yada yada....

They are becoming more and more desperate by the week.

And it's fantastic to see.
 
What I want to know is did the cameras pan onto the away end and happened to pick out the players or was there a little tip off by a certain PR department...
I have often sat in the first couple of rows at Anfield and you can't see what is going on so why did they choose seats there unless they wanted to be easily seen? I am sure that visiting players get good seats at away matches as a matter of routine.

The only crowds shots I like are those of the Brazilian and other pretty girls at the WC. What a contrast with Phil The Face.
 
Last edited:
What I want to know is did the cameras pan onto the away end and happened to pick out the players or was there a little tip off by a certain PR department...

Such cynicism hehe ;-)
 
It was obviously a huge PR stunt on behalf of the club. And i think most fans of other clubs found it pathetic and laughable. Jones & Rojo who have been pretty shit, are now 'loved' by the fans for cheering on the great win against Liverpool. ooh, they're just like us, one of the lads, they love United, yada yada yada....

They are becoming more and more desperate by the week.

And it's fantastic to see.

Blatantly. That Tyler also knew (and felt the urge to inform everyone) that Carrick was somewhere as well makes it obvious.

Tyler was well 'on message' all day - Smith (? - the co-commentator) noted Shrek had only got 6 PL goals and this was a sign of Utd's problems scoring, and Tyler was straight in with his "but 12 in all" to try hiding the negative statement.
 
What I want to know is did the cameras pan onto the away end and happened to pick out the players or was there a little tip off by a certain PR department...
It should have come with a warning to take kids out of the room. It looked like a battle scene from Lord of the rings.
 
So I take it that the media will refer to martial as the £60m man as sterling is the £49m man?
 
Blatantly. That Tyler also knew (and felt the urge to inform everyone) that Carrick was somewhere as well makes it obvious.

Tyler was well 'on message' all day - Smith (? - the co-commentator) noted Shrek had only got 6 PL goals and this was a sign of Utd's problems scoring, and Tyler was straight in with his "but 12 in all" to try hiding the negative statement.

Tyler doing his best to hide the truth.
Interesting this 12 goals in total comment. bbc news sport, in the utd section have shrek down as 12 goals scored, then break them down as:
CL 1 ,FA 1,PL 6,LC 1..which of course makes 9 in total not 12....have they just inc england penalties as well or CL qualifiers....because they havent inc international goals for anyone else i have checked...ie kdb
The england captan gets so much positive press he doesn,t need an agent.
 
Rooney plus Martial? Excellent waste of money. Massive in fact. About 100 million is it then? If their 650 million fans chip in a tanner it'll help.
will they get a free shirt like they did with the bring back ronaldo campaign ?.......oh wait.......whatever did happen to that money ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.