Chick Counterfly said:FantasyIreland said:So whose fault is it?
Mancini had ample opportunity in Jan to address the imbalances that were obvious to many and he failed to do so.
He has even stated today that AJ is the only capable player of his type,citing his unavailability as hugely influential on our tactics and results.
Couple the above with no cover for Silva.....
That lack of foresight was a huge gamble that may still not pay off.
Responsibility for player recruitment is shared between Mike Rigg, Brian Marwood, Mancini and at least one other. It's not clear if any one of them has more say than the other. In fact I would suggest that Cook and then Khaldoon are responsible for saying yay or nay to purchases, as they have the responsibility to manage the finances. So it's at more than possible that if Mancini wanted another player, he might not have got his way. The committee might not agree on the target. If the target was not available in the window, or the club/agent were being silly, they may well decide to wait. Even if Mancini wanted someone, anyone, they could easily say 'No, you have enough to do your job for now'. Khaldoon or Cook might say no, we have a financial target this year. Or The Sheik could simply say, umm, I don't want to spend any more right now.
Brian Marwood holds the key to any transfers - he can call on almost any resource he needs to to get the best information and best deal for the club.
Although Mancini (and any CIty manager employed by ADUG) has his opinions on players the list of possible new recruits is far from his own.
It will be really interesting to see what happens in the summer window though as then the old excuse of 'top players need champions league' will come crashing against the hardened City attitude of leaving players alone who have previously said no.