Var debate 2019/20

[Blue Mist]

I watched a game where Jesus jumped for a cross and in doing so slightly pushed the defender before heading into the net. After 3 minutes of VAR reviewing every angle they disallowed the goal without the need for the ref to see the pitch side monitor. Later in the game Sterling pushed the ball passed the defender who then lunged in. The referee gave a penalty but ask VAR to review it. They took 4 minutes and looked at different angles and decided no penalty. Finally in the same game Jesus was through on goal with only the keeper to beat, a defender then appeared to push him over. The referee gave a free kick and awarded a red card against the defender. VAR again looked at the incident and after another 3 minutes over turned the decision and Jesus was booked for diving. With City now pushing for an equaliser and 10 minutes of time lost due to VAR the 4th official holds the board up to show 2 minutes of time added on.

Anyone else see the game ?

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

I watched a game where Jesus jumped for a cross and in doing so slightly pushed the defender before heading into the net. After 3 minutes of VAR reviewing every angle they disallowed the goal without the need for the ref to see the pitch side monitor. Later in the game Sterling pushed the ball passed the defender who then lunged in. The referee gave a penalty but ask VAR to review it. They took 4 minutes and looked at different angles and decided no penalty. Finally in the same game Jesus was through on goal with only the keeper to beat, a defender then appeared to push him over. The referee gave a free kick and awarded a red card against the defender. VAR again looked at the incident and after another 3 minutes over turned the decision and Jesus was booked for diving. With City now pushing for an equaliser and 10 minutes of time lost due to VAR the 4th official holds the board up to show 2 minutes of time added on.

Anyone else see the game ?

McManaman did.

 

[Blue Mist]

McManaman did.

Yep, and I am sure a few other hacks did as well. But it shows that when refereeing is done properly and VAR is done likewise their are no reviews that go on for ages. There was no push, it was a penalty and it was a sending off but the main thing was there were no lengthy VAR delays, so why is it so different in the Premier League ?

Don't worry I know the answer.

 

[creditunionhero]

I can't wait for pigmol to show their refs the match as a training exercise in how to officiate a game and var.


I know it won't happen.

 

[kaz7]

Finally it worked for the dippers the same way it works for everyone else

 

[quiet_riot]

Finally it worked for the dippers the same way it works for everyone else

After it's done its job of securing them a big lead.

 

[kaz7]

After it's done its job of securing them a big lead.

Absolutely,they went months without it applying to them whilst they were killing our hopes with it

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

I watched a game where Jesus jumped for a cross and in doing so slightly pushed the defender before heading into the net. After 3 minutes of VAR reviewing every angle they disallowed the goal without the need for the ref to see the pitch side monitor. Later in the game Sterling pushed the ball passed the defender who then lunged in. The referee gave a penalty but ask VAR to review it. They took 4 minutes and looked at different angles and decided no penalty. Finally in the same game Jesus was through on goal with only the keeper to beat, a defender then appeared to push him over. The referee gave a free kick and awarded a red card against the defender. VAR again looked at the incident and after another 3 minutes over turned the decision and Jesus was booked for diving. With City now pushing for an equaliser and 10 minutes of time lost due to VAR the 4th official holds the board up to show 2 minutes of time added on.

Anyone else see the game ?

Mike Riley saw this game. Peter Walton gave a convoluted explanation about the Jesus goal being disallowed and an obfuscated excuse to justify the penalty being overturned. He found it difficult to agree with the booking but could see why VAR concluded that Jesus dived.

 

[blueinsa]

Infantino has basically called out PiGMOB over their handling and use of VAR today.

 

[kaz7]

Infantino has basically called out PiGMOB over their handling and use of VAR today.

What is he saying?

 

[blueinsa]

What is he saying?

We are the only league in Europe having the constant issues and that the refs need to use the monitors, like they do elsewhere and in his opinion, most of the arguments surrounding it here will disappear.

 

[RayCTID]

Horse and stable door springs to mind

 

[kaz7]

We are the only league in Europe having the constant issues and that the refs need to use the monitors, like they do elsewhere and in his opinion, most of the arguments surrounding it here will disappear.

Thanks,he has a good point,the way we are using it here makes a mockery of the whole system,it has been used here to decide the title in the way they wanted it to go from game 1,it was another lie that the refs can use the monitors,if they could they would be doing it,pigmol have told so many lies this season they don't know which way is up,they are corrupt here

 

[Blue Mist]

Horse and stable door springs to mind

Or horse and LiVARpools title is another way of putting it.

 

[SebastianBlue]

NBCSN post-match analysis absolutely going after Moss’ decision to disallow the Everton winner.

They put it simply and perfectly: “How you can assess this is would the outcome be different if the player was not on the ground in the sequence and the answer is no, De Gea would not save that, therefore it is not an interfering action *and* it’s not a clear and obvious error for the referee to have given the goal. The goal should have stood.”

 

[RayCTID]

They can't keep giving Liverpool a helping hand.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

We are the only league in Europe having the constant issues and that the refs need to use the monitors, like they do elsewhere and in his opinion, most of the arguments surrounding it here will disappear.

Corruption, it’s so obvious after what we’ve city go through over the past few weeks. Liverpool and United are in on it, just like their favourable VAR decisions. No one can convince me otherwise.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Corruption, it’s so obvious after what we’ve city go through over the past few weeks. Liverpool and United are in on it, just like their favourable VAR decisions. No one can convince me otherwise.

VAR was brought in to help make the game more fair, but if that was at the other end I have no doubt that is given as a goal.

100% bent.

 

[ancoats]

the premier officials are bent and VAR is a joke

everton goal right at the end is a goal no matter what video replay you show ? DDG seen the ball and was wrong footed by the deflection so how can united say he was unsighted also the eveton play on the floor did not go for the ball ? and if the VAR team watch the tackle on the everton player its a nailed on pen any way ? so no matter what they says it was pressure to give united the point in the chase for 4th or 5th place. would it have been crossed out by VAR if it was united who score it ??

 

[cookster]

the premier officials are bent and VAR is a joke

everton goal right at the end is a goal no matter what video replay you show ? DDG seen the ball and was wrong footed by the deflection so how can united say he was unsighted also the eveton play on the floor did not go for the ball ? and if the VAR team watch the tackle on the everton player its a nailed on pen any way ? so no matter what they says it was pressure to give united the point in the chase for 4th or 5th place. would it have been crossed out by VAR if it was united who score it ??

If you watch the replay again even if Sigurdsson was ruled offside it's because he completely taken out by a Utd player. Minimum penalty.