BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 32,849
The second one was offside as the Chelsea player closest to the camera in the box bumped the defender, interfering with play.
The second one was offside as the Chelsea player closest to the camera in the box bumped the defender, interfering with play.
The first is a poor decision.
Both show the advantage of having VAR though.Fair enough.
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
Exactly. I don’t agree with 100% of the rugby refs decisions but being able to listen to their reasoning at least enables me to understand it.This is all I ask for.
Compared to the Spurs farce that was a very measured and professional conversation.
Let us listen in and we'll understand it and accept the decisions. As you say it would remove the conspiracy theories from it.
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
Ha, scraping the barrel now