Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Already too many stoppages without adding even more. Introducing VAR has added to the stoppages, to add appeals would add even more. Used to stop the momentum of the opposition this would be used for timeouts as well. I guess would save Arteta the time asking his GK to feign injury, just one example of how it would be used to manipulate things.Wait, so when a corrupt on-field official ignores something blatant, we should just "get on with the game" even when we, the fans, or TV picks up that blatant decision?
At least if the players are able to challenge that decision the ref would have to review it in front of the worldwide audience.
And it's not slow-mo or freeze frame that's, in itself, the issue(but it is in isolation), it's viewing in context that's not always presented and that should be consistent.
For me, the inconsistency of interpretation for the viewing of VAR is the issue.
What about when a challenge has been rejected by the "corrupt" on-field and off-field official or, do you want to introduce a panel to appeal too?
Then the appeal quota has been exhausted and another blatant incident is ignored, what then?
Want to get rid of VAR not add more to it Football was fine for over 100years and VAR has not improved it, made it worse if anything. Decisions are in the main subjective yet they have made a mockery of trying to change the laws and interpretations to make it less so
Last edited: