I'm being honest and I prefer football without VAR..I'm sure I'm not aloneThe point is without VAR the decisions would have been allowed to stand, imagine the outrage and outcry when Stones winner got ruled out ? Would be massive cries of corruption.
VAR is far from perfect, will never get decisions 100% correct but as can tell this season it is very much needed
Haha, i know but made you look . Funny how you never have a list of mistakes they make , one day maybe
The dippers can’t stand ‘Manc’ Alti.Indeed.
This was a the PL have had their arses handed to them so we can't fuck up week.
Back to normal when Alti Fan refs the Dippers match this weekend...
Thought we had all the refs in our back pocketThe dippers can’t stand ‘Manc’ Alti.
Not only that, all paid for and bought, according to them, the most paranoid fan base going. Or should that say entitled and moaning when they don’t get their way?Thought we had all the refs in our back pocket
After Scudamores united comment it should be us complaining about officials…Not only that, all paid for and bought, according to them, the most paranoid fan base going. Or should that say entitled and moaning when they don’t get their way?
Either or, cunty nonetheless.
Frolm what I have seen the lino didn't raise his flag. Or doesn't the need to anymore if he can do it verbally?The. Lino. Disallowed. The. Goal. The. VAR. told. The. Ref. To. Check it again.
No the assistant ref must raise his flag for offside. So everyone one supposedly knows what is happening and in case the coms system has gone downFrolm what I have seen the lino didn't raise his flag. Or doesn't the need to anymore if he can do it verbally?
They knew it was a goal all the time. The onfield team deliberately disallowed the goal so that the VAR could come along and overturn the decision. This devious ploy serves three purposes.So are people off the “VAR is against us” train now?
It's hard to disagree with that.They knew it was a goal all the time. The onfield team deliberately disallowed the goal so that the VAR could come along and overturn the decision. This devious ploy serves three purposes.
1. It contributes a positive mark to this league table, to make it look like City are benefiting from VAR decisions.
2. It makes Attwell look good for spotting an error and recommending a review. This helps to pad his overall poor refereeing stats with some positivity, and at the same time reduces his unpopularity amongst City fans.
3. It makes Cavanagh look good for accepting his mistake and changing his decision.
It is a skillfully engineered scenario in which there are many winners, but no losers. [emoji6]
That's what I thought. If you watch it, the lino doesn't raise the flag. In fact he switches the flag from his left to right hand and uses his left hand to point to the centre circle. He was also visible when Pep was celebrating and was then looking towards the Wolves dug out, but that's a good 20 seconds after the goal was scored. At no stage does the ref blow or indicate that the goal shouldn't stand, but neither does he point to the centre circle. I actually think this is the perfect case for the audio to be made public because the assumption is the on-field decision was no goal and I'm not convinced it was. It's almost like they were looking for a reason to disallow it, but every goal is checked anyway. As it is, they just look incompetent.No the assistant ref must raise his flag for offside. So everyone one supposedly knows what is happening and in case the coms system has gone down
That means Pigmol are not acting honestly.It's hard to disagree with that.
I said at the time it looked like they'd engineered that VAR situation to make it look like the system was working. Even in real-time everyone knew there was absolutely nothing wrong with our goal, borne out by the fact that none of their players complained when the ball hit the back of the net. Their manager only complained after it had gone to VAR. If the goal had been given on the field and it hadn't gone to VAR, I'm almost certain he wouldn't have complained.
I'm not sure the PiGMOL have ever been entirely honest in the way they manage games.That means Pigmol are not acting honestly.
If this was manipulation/dishonesty you can see why many of us want rid.
That's what I thought. If you watch it, the lino doesn't raise the flag. In fact he switches the flag from his left to right hand and uses his left hand to point to the centre circle. He was also visible when Pep was celebrating and was then looking towards the Wolves dug out, but that's a good 20 seconds after the goal was scored. At no stage does the ref blow or indicate that the goal shouldn't stand, but neither does he point to the centre circle. I actually think this is the perfect case for the audio to be made public because the assumption is the on-field decision was no goal and I'm not convinced it was. It's almost like they were looking for a reason to disallow it, but every goal is checked anyway. As it is, they just look incompetent.
This is the VAR explainer guy. Always worth a read on a Sunday/Monday (it’s a thread if you click on the tweet)Frolm what I have seen the lino didn't raise his flag. Or doesn't the need to anymore if he can do it verbally?
lolThey knew it was a goal all the time. The onfield team deliberately disallowed the goal so that the VAR could come along and overturn the decision. This devious ploy serves three purposes.
1. It contributes a positive mark to this league table, to make it look like City are benefiting from VAR decisions.
2. It makes Attwell look good for spotting an error and recommending a review. This helps to pad his overall poor refereeing stats with some positivity, and at the same time reduces his unpopularity amongst City fans.
3. It makes Cavanagh look good for accepting his mistake and changing his decision.
It is a skillfully engineered scenario in which there are many winners, but no losers. [emoji6]
So are people off the “VAR is against us” train now?
Click on the tweet thread and ask him.How do you come to that conclusion from that particular statistic?
That is just the net for/against number of "clear and obvious mistakes" made by referees which have been "corrected" by VAR. If you believe VAR is working perfectly, the only conclusion you can come to is that referees make more "clear and obvious mistakes" against City than most other clubs. Which, in itself, is a concern.
If you don't believe VAR is working perfectly then, without knowing the number of "clear and obvious mistakes" made by referees which you think have not been "corrected" by VAR, you can't conclude anything about how VAR is applied to different clubs. And that is completely subjective, as is the question of whether you believe VAR is working perfectly or not, really.
So, to answer your question, logically no.
Click on the tweet thread and ask him.
This is the VAR explainer guy. Always worth a read on a Sunday/Monday (it’s a thread if you click on the tweet)
Linesman conferred with the ref and said Silva was off but he couldn’t be sure he was interfering. Ref disallowed the goal as he initially thought Silva was in the way. VAR cleared it up and told the ref to watch on the monitor.