Yeah he ran? But distinct lack of quality throughout. Just saying.Sorry i'm not having that one. I agree about Sterling but i thought Bernardo worked his socks off
Gotta hold my hands up, it was driving me round the twist watching him (and Raz) tonight, but he proved me wrong, in the most delightful fashion :-)Whatever it was a cracking strike from Bernardo
I agree 100%.but there main aim was to try and nick the game on the break ? yes defended well at times but city could and maybe should have had 3 goals in the first half. city had to work hard for the win and that in itself says villa was setup to park the bus and break ??
also the pitch was a game changer and very heavy and city could not find our normal game and it played into villa hands. it was advantage to villa because city played 4 games in a short space of time villa none
i don't like to give credit to a losing team ? villa will bemoan the 2 goals anyway but the truth is city had 28 chances
and major part of the game was in the villa half ?
The media, most pundits and a shed load of others are against us and now you want the rules changed to disallow a perfectly good goal?? It’s as legitimate a goal as a 50 yard thunderbolt, let’s rejoice in it not wonder why the rules allowed it??Rodri gained 20 odd yards on Mings before he touched the ball. He was in the perfect position to dispossess him due to the run he had made from an offside position.
My argument isn’t that Rodri was offside because the law states he clearly wasn’t, it’s that the law should change so Rodri should be offside.
Yes Gundo puts it in the other corner!Brilliant and one that probably only he scores
you need to brush up on the laws fella its not even in doubt.its a perfectly good goal/Rodri gained 20 odd yards on Mings before he touched the ball. He was in the perfect position to dispossess him due to the run he had made from an offside position.
My argument isn’t that Rodri was offside because the law states he clearly wasn’t, it’s that the law should change so Rodri should be offside.
That would be very harsh!Rodri would not be blown up
I’m not sure most fans would like to see an offside rule that made it an offence for a player to make a tackle.Rodri gained 20 odd yards on Mings before he touched the ball. He was in the perfect position to dispossess him due to the run he had made from an offside position.
My argument isn’t that Rodri was offside because the law states he clearly wasn’t, it’s that the law should change so Rodri should be offside.
Rodri didn’t interfere with play when he was in the offside position. He actually wasn’t anywhere near him:
![]()
Then as soon as Mings deliberately controls the ball (chested it) he starts a new phase of play and the offside is cancelled.
View attachment 8647
(still not interfering with play).
And only then did Rodri win the ball off him.
If Rodri had challenged for the ball before Mings chested it, he would have been offside, but he didn’t.
I agree 100%.
Sure they defended quite well.
There game plan though was Rag....esq
Let us have the Ball and try and hit us on the counter.
Possession Stats, shots on goal say the best side won.
Which we did.
Defensive football against us people think deserves a reward.
When it is against the Candle waivers, or Rags...........it becomes killing football.
you need to brush up on the laws fella its not even in doubt.its a perfectly good goal/
We'll take some stopping now.Not our clinical best.........but great effort and 3 wonderful points and top of the fucking league!!!
The first goal was very generous given Rodri was offside,but fuck it.....we deserved some luck.
Now come on Fulham,Tosin defend like you life depends on it!
MOTM - Bernardo,but that's debateable give 3 or 4 other brilliant performances.
Poor Rodri, he been slagged off on here for months because he’s too slow, and now he makes up a bit of ground you’re having a go for him being too fast.Those two still frames actually sum up the point I’m trying to make. That the ground he’s made up ‘should’ constitute interfering with play.
Either way it’s a very intelligent move from Rodri to wait for that precise moment to challenge for the ball.
Ruben is five or six years from hitting his peak. Monumental player.Probably been mentioned umpteen times but I’d just like to reiterate that RUBEN DIAS IS TWENTY THREE (23)
On another note....Cancelo, Foden, Gundogan absolutely fantastic tonight....all 9/10 performances
so why are you saying its harshYou need to learn to read mate. I’ve not stated otherwise.