It's as relevant as Liverpool are in the title race.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Virgil van Dijk
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
It's as relevant as Liverpool are in the title race.
Decepticon
Well-Known Member
Is this thread still relevant?
For some..probably gutted that we didn't get him, I rather we go for Inigo Martinez..
Most recent big one was Dortmund in 2016 actually. Only The Europa Cup I know but there ya go.we do have anfield ?ah those glorious European nights,like st Etienne ,and erm Chelsea :)
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.
City are having a good old chuckle at this one.
Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.
Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.
This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.
Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?
City are having a good old chuckle at this one.
Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.
Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.
This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.
Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 25,975
All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.
City are having a good old chuckle at this one.
Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.
Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.
This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.
Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?
So we definitely have a CB coming in tolm?
Huh! So it seems I'm not the only one wh9 thought 60 million was a rip-off :)All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.
City are having a good old chuckle at this one.
Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.
Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.
This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.
Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 14,644
Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?
Who was that?
John Henry.Who was that?
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,609
Mediocre at best he was shit against us.
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 14,644
John Henry.
Interesting! Cheers mate.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.