You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
West Ham United (A) | PL | Post-Match Thread
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 37,002
Well played Blues.
I didn’t go today and to be honest I wasn’t fussed, just feels like such a dead rubber match.
I know that’s so defeatist but I just have zero hope when we play you. Anyone else in PL I feel we have a chance.
Glad to hear we put in a shift though, Paqueta, JWP and Areola getting a lot of praise - we’re in a great place at present so I’m a happy hammer despite the defeat.
Nice win for you Blues and I don’t see anyone but yourselves for the title.
I didn’t go today and to be honest I wasn’t fussed, just feels like such a dead rubber match.
I know that’s so defeatist but I just have zero hope when we play you. Anyone else in PL I feel we have a chance.
Glad to hear we put in a shift though, Paqueta, JWP and Areola getting a lot of praise - we’re in a great place at present so I’m a happy hammer despite the defeat.
Nice win for you Blues and I don’t see anyone but yourselves for the title.
It was a strange game. You played really well and could have won. But if Haaland had his shooting boots on we could have won 8-1Well played Blues.
I didn’t go today and to be honest I wasn’t fussed, just feels like such a dead rubber match.
I know that’s so defeatist but I just have zero hope when we play you. Anyone else in PL I feel we have a chance.
Glad to hear we put in a shift though, Paqueta, JWP and Areola getting a lot of praise - we’re in a great place at present so I’m a happy hammer despite the defeat.
Nice win for you Blues and I don’t see anyone but yourselves for the title.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 37,002
It was a strange game. You played really well and could have won. But if Haaland had his shooting boots on we could have won 8-1
It’s actually scary how many Haaland could actually score if he didn’t miss a fair few. Not knocking him. One of the best strikers ever already. Just some games I think Jesus, he should have had about 5 goals!
Brightwell Bros.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 7,697
Jesus would never have scored five of those chances.It’s actually scary how many Haaland could actually score if he didn’t miss a fair few. Not knocking him. One of the best strikers ever already. Just some games I think Jesus, he should have had about 5 goals!
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 37,002
Jesus would never have scored five of those chances.
Haha
Six wasn’t itPep's first season was 5 on the bounce.
eversince 76
Well-Known Member
Blue Hammer 85 deserves respect. You disrespect him by stating West Ham could have won the game when they were outplayed for 90 minutes. We could and probably should have won 8-1 yes. Haaland could have had the easiest of hattricks so far and missed two sitters Sterling no doubt would have put away.It was a strange game. You played really well and could have won. But if Haaland had his shooting boots on we could have won 8-1
I thought West Ham was set by Moyes the only way Moyes knows. I have a soft spot for West Ham but imho they were very mediocre as a team playing at home. And we were simply very good and progressing.
Last year we did, but not last seasonwe dropped points at west ham last year, is that the game haaland scored 2 in a 2-0 win
bluwes
Well-Known Member
That Was noticeable.Lucas Paquetá he wants to be blue