Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,100
LOL… Apologies for having an opinion mardarse
You're entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that you're a moronic ****.
LOL… Apologies for having an opinion mardarse
Noted…You're entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that you're a moronic ****.
These international obligations do not apply until somebody sets foot on UK soil,
You're entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that you're a moronic ****.
Your next username should be Ronnie Pickering.
Aren't you the one with the puce face?
I've been waiting years )Took longer than i thought that
Not "more welcoming", just taking many more than the UK.It is a hard read, it is notable that...
"Belgium reportedly denied him asylum by arguing that Basra, his hometown in Iraq, was classified as a safe area. He said his children spent the last seven years staying with a relative in Sweden, but that he was recently informed that they would be deported, with him, to Iraq."
I do think that there is a bit of an image on this thread that other countries are more welcoming and that the UK is an outlier, which is clearly not the case. Of course that doesn't help people like this poor bugger.
It's not an urban myth. It's government disinformation.Its an urban myth that you have to apply for Asylum in the 1st safe country.
Should refugees claim asylum in the first safe country they reach? - Free Movement
Over and over again we hear that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country the reach. There are variations on the theme. Genuine refugees claimfreemovement.org.uk
the vast majority of the people trying to get here already have family links here too and get granted asylum at the end of the day.