What is the meaning of this?

Pam

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 Aug 2004
Messages
35,270
"We'' go with what we have?! Explanation anyone?

<a class="postlink" href="http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=663092&sec=england&cc=5739" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story ... nd&cc=5739</a>
Hughes will not drop standards in defender search
July 26, 2009
Comment
Email
Print
Manchester City boss Mark Hughes does not intend to settle for second best in his bid to sign defenders if moves for John Terry and Joleon Lescott do not come off.


The pair have been on the radar of the Eastlands outfit all summer, with their respective clubs, Chelsea and Everton, already turning down several attempts to land their signatures.

Speaking after his side lost the final match of their pre-season tour of South Africa 1-0 against Kaizer Chiefs, Hughes said he is only interested in bringing in players better than those already at the City of Manchester Stadium.

''We're in the market for good players that we think will improve us,'' he said. ''If we can bring them to the club, then we'll be very delighted.

''But a lot of the good players out there are at good clubs and clubs that don't have to do business with us.

''It's a case of saying what's available, what we can bring to the football club to improve. If the only players that are available are players that won't improve us to any great extent, then we go with what we have.

''Because it doesn't make sense to bring players in that are at a same level, we need to bring players in that are at a better level.''

Terry has looked like the prime target of Hughes all summer and asked whether the silence over the issue by the England captain had convinced him even further that the player would be interested in a move, he said: ''I have no idea.

''John Terry is a player not at the club, who I keep having to answer questions about. We made a bid for a player that was rejected and that's where we stand at this moment in time.

''Irrespective of what his club does or what John does, we can have no influence on that and that's where we are really.''

City have already made major inroads in the transfer market this summer, bringing in Roque Santa Cruz, Carlos Tevez, Gareth Barry and Emmanuel Adebayor, the latter pair featuring in today's game against Chiefs in Pretoria.

Following the arrival of those top names, there is also likely to be additional pressure on Hughes to deliverer and he knows the stakes are high.

He continued: ''There's been a lot of speculation and debates over a lot of things in connection to Manchester City.

''I've said before, last year expectations were too high for us to fulfil. This year we hope to do better in that respect, we hope to obviously have a squad of players that will compete and do very well.

''Every manager has an expectation on them and I'm no different from any manager in the Premier League or South African football. The pressure is always there to win football matches and we live with that on a daily basis.

''Maybe last year I lived with that more than most, but I'm quite comfortable with that as an expectation. It's something that we deal with quite regularly and it doesn't worry me unduly. It's part and parcel of being a football manager.''

Former Arsenal striker Adebayor, one of City's biggest summer signings, made an encouraging start to his career under Hughes, despite the club losing, and linked up impressively at the Loftus Versfeld Stadium alongside the likes of Craig Bellamy and Martin Petrov up front.

The manager said: ''I thought Emmanuel was excellent today. For his first game, obviously when you combine a player of his quality and standing in the game, then you expect a certain level of performance and he certainly provided that for us.

''He showed the qualities that we all know he has, which will be invaluable for us this season, so we're absolutely delighted that he's here. He's going to be a huge player for us this season once the team understands the best way to play with him.

''He plays in a way that enables him to get the best out of his team-mates, so we've got an exceptional player. So we're delighted with his performance today and sure we'll be really happy with his performance right through the season.''

Youngster Javan Vidal, Richard Dunne and Nedum Onuoha all picked up injuries in the game, but Hughes does not think any of them are too serious.

''Richard Dunne has a little problem with his knee which is consequence of an international at the end of the season that has dragged on and as a result he was finding it uncomfortable today as he was playing.

''There was no point taking chances, so we took him off as a precaution.

''Nedum has nine stitches in a head wound. Javan Vidal had to come off with a badly gashed shin. But he's walking around, so there's no long-term damage.''




6 comments on "Hughes will not drop standards in defender search"


Click here for the latest Manchester City offers in the Soccernet Store
Ads by Google

Find what you need
Pick up the telephone - give Defender Locksmiths a call
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.defender-locksmiths.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">www.defender-locksmiths.co.uk</a>

Stormwater Filtration
High rate, cost-effective stormwater filtration
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.Hydro-International.biz" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">www.Hydro-International.biz</a>

BlackBerry Cases
Stylish leather cases to protect & Add class to your BlackBerry
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.TheBlackBerryStore.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">www.TheBlackBerryStore.co.uk</a>


More Transfers News
Transfers Home
On The Move blog
Club Pages
Manchester City
England Headlines
Redknapp wants Crouch to replace Bent at Spurs
Arshavin backs Adebayor exit | Bendtner staying
Liverpool's Dossena wants Napoli move - agent
Pienaar rejects new Toffees deal - report
Wigan tell Sunderland: Back off Cattermole

Inside Soccernet
 
Think it's a bit of posturing to be honest, I'd be amazed if we don't add at least one senior defender.

At the end of it though, I hope we look at a few younger signings that might not be ready to make an impact straight away but have the potential to be quality players in a few years time.
 
He's just saying that if we're unable to buy players who are
better than what we already have then we'll just keep the
ones we have and go with those.
 
if Hughes says we are desperate to sign defenders whenever we enquire the price of the player goes sky high.
 
Harry Godwin said:
He's just saying that if we're unable to buy players who are
better than what we already have then we'll just keep the
ones we have and go with those.

But does that mean we won't be bringing anyone in? We need defenders. We can't go with what we've got!
 
What needs explaining?, seems pretty straightforward to me!. We ain`t gonna sign any old crap, just for the sake of it. If the player potentially to be signed doesn`t improve us, we don`t sign him, and go with what we already have.

Simples really
 
It means we wont buy for buyings sake!! a very sensible approach!! some people love to have good panick over nothing!!
 
trublue55 said:
What needs explaining?, seems pretty straightforward to me!. We ain`t gonna sign any old crap, just for the sake of it. If the player potentially to be signed doesn`t improve us, we don`t sign him, and go with what we already have.

Simples really

I know but shouldn't we be breaking the bank to make sure this does not happen?
 
trublue55 said:
What needs explaining?, seems pretty straightforward to me!. We ain`t gonna sign any old crap, just for the sake of it. If the player potentially to be signed doesn`t improve us, we don`t sign him, and go with what we already have.

Simples really

Exactly,however,we will be signing a defender or two that will improve us so panic over Pam - relax,you don't want a nosebleed!
 
Pam said:
Harry Godwin said:
He's just saying that if we're unable to buy players who are
better than what we already have then we'll just keep the
ones we have and go with those.

But does that mean we won't be bringing anyone in? We need defenders. We can't go with what we've got!

It means, if the only players available are no better than what we have, then we dont bring anyone in. However i believe that its fairly obvious that "better than what we have" will become avaliable if we are prepared to pay enough, and therefore highly likely we will make further signings, and will not "go with what we have". Sounds to me that someone is stating the bloody obvious
 
"But a lot of the good players out there are at good clubs and clubs that don't have to do business with us".

What about this, then? Hopefully this is just a reference to the JT thing.
 
Pam said:
"But a lot of the good players out there are at good clubs and clubs that don't have to do business with us".

What about this, then? Hopefully this is just a reference to the JT thing.


We`ve just tried to buy a player, (against his current club`s wishes,) from probably the only club in the Prem, who dont have to listen to our very talkative money. Just about every other club would (eventually) succumb to our financial advances, and just about every other player (with a few notable exception) would be signable, if we were prepared to pay enough. We will make further signings.
 
It's ripped right from an interview on Sky, with some comments thrown in.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/video/clips/0,23791,12602_5453816,00.html?ssvTab=1&ssvSelectedTab=12599&ssvBasket=12602&ssvPage=2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/video/clips/0, ... &ssvPage=2</a>
 
My worry is Hughes will have no plan B, like in Jan when we needed a targetman badly and he wouldn't look past RSC. I'm not talking about dropping your standards I'm talking about looking past your comfort zone sometimes.
 
My worry is Hughes will have no plan B, like in Jan when we needed a targetman badly and he wouldn't look past RSC. I'm not talking about dropping your standards I'm talking about looking past your comfort zone sometimes.
 
MH has had a full sason to scout the world for better than RD and Ned.

If he can't find better than these two ( i know they aren't that bad ) it shows how poor his scouting infrastructure is.

I assume this is just media talk, but if we went into this season with the same defense as last season we would probably do better BUT i imagine 95% of City supporters would be dissapointed seeing as it was our main weakness last season.

Hope he didn't put all his eggs in the Terry basket which was an obvious long shot
 
DontLookBackInAnger said:
My worry is Hughes will have no plan B, like in Jan when we needed a targetman badly and he wouldn't look past RSC. I'm not talking about dropping your standards I'm talking about looking past your comfort zone sometimes.

It does make you wonder about our scouting.
The signings we have bought have all been obvious really.
I could have said "yes he's a good player" all proven top quality guys.
I am all in favour of this but a lesser known good player would be a nice change.
To be honest I knew little about Kompany last season before we got him but this season all ahev been well known and so expensive.
 
Pam said:
trublue55 said:
What needs explaining?, seems pretty straightforward to me!. We ain`t gonna sign any old crap, just for the sake of it. If the player potentially to be signed doesn`t improve us, we don`t sign him, and go with what we already have.

Simples really

I know but shouldn't we be breaking the bank to make sure this does not happen?

I can't imagine Hughes going all penny-pinching:

(a) it's not his money
(b) he is sacked if we don't deliver next season

He won't want the same old dross at the back, will he.

EDIT: Sorry, the same old "loyal campaigners". I forgot myself for a moment.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top