Ant-emilydesign
Well-Known Member
Seems the club are getting involved in all the negativity in the media...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/What-the-papers-say/2010/August/Big-bad-Blues" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/What-the-pap ... -bad-Blues</a>
Sick of it.
Trying to find a positive story about City today is like trying to find a needle in the proverbial haystack.
It’s fair to say the negativity surrounding the Blues has never been higher in the majority of the nation’s press with the club portrayed as some kind of pantomime villain.
Andy Dunn in the News of the World is typical of many columnists in his ‘Bling City’ feature.
He writes: “Great players go to Real Madrid or Barcelona. That’s not City’s fault. Who can blame them for wanting to play under Jose Mourinho at such a fabled club? Or turn out for a team that is setting new standards in the game?”
One wonders what standards Dunn is referring to, with Madrid unable to land the Champions League or even their domestic title last season.
Paul Wilson in The Observer claims Roberto Mancini needs to improve his record against The Big Four, and even has to shoe-horn Tottenham in to add weight to his piece.
“His City side have been unable to score a goal against Tottenham, Liverpool, Manchester United or Arsenal, let alone beat them,” he writes. Does he then mean big five or six? And where are Aston Villa in all this?
While Spurs and United did secure 1-0 wins at the City of Manchester Stadium towards the end of last season, Villa were dispatched, a point was gained at the Emirates Stadium and the Blues completed the double of eventual champions Chelsea 4-2 in their own backyard, though even that win, says Wilson, was because Chelsea were “somewhat subdued because of the John Terry scandal.
It should be noted that the Blues boss only took over at the end of December!
Elsewhere there are stories of Shay Given, Robinho, Stephen Ireland and Craig Bellamy, but if you’re looking for a positive spin on the club you love, it might be a day to give most of the back pages a wide berth.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/What-the-papers-say/2010/August/Big-bad-Blues" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/What-the-pap ... -bad-Blues</a>
Sick of it.
Trying to find a positive story about City today is like trying to find a needle in the proverbial haystack.
It’s fair to say the negativity surrounding the Blues has never been higher in the majority of the nation’s press with the club portrayed as some kind of pantomime villain.
Andy Dunn in the News of the World is typical of many columnists in his ‘Bling City’ feature.
He writes: “Great players go to Real Madrid or Barcelona. That’s not City’s fault. Who can blame them for wanting to play under Jose Mourinho at such a fabled club? Or turn out for a team that is setting new standards in the game?”
One wonders what standards Dunn is referring to, with Madrid unable to land the Champions League or even their domestic title last season.
Paul Wilson in The Observer claims Roberto Mancini needs to improve his record against The Big Four, and even has to shoe-horn Tottenham in to add weight to his piece.
“His City side have been unable to score a goal against Tottenham, Liverpool, Manchester United or Arsenal, let alone beat them,” he writes. Does he then mean big five or six? And where are Aston Villa in all this?
While Spurs and United did secure 1-0 wins at the City of Manchester Stadium towards the end of last season, Villa were dispatched, a point was gained at the Emirates Stadium and the Blues completed the double of eventual champions Chelsea 4-2 in their own backyard, though even that win, says Wilson, was because Chelsea were “somewhat subdued because of the John Terry scandal.
It should be noted that the Blues boss only took over at the end of December!
Elsewhere there are stories of Shay Given, Robinho, Stephen Ireland and Craig Bellamy, but if you’re looking for a positive spin on the club you love, it might be a day to give most of the back pages a wide berth.