What's the difference between Cancelo's foul and TAA's 'challenge'?

It’s a common trait with dipper players if an opponent is running near the touch line to give a little shove and help them over the hoardings.complete snidey cunts
This is correct.
I remember Kane getting called out a few seasons back for looking at players then backing into them while they were high off the ground going for headers.
A very dangerous deliberate tactic by the big chinned wanker, but he stopped as a result of being called out.
Those 2 rats T-rent and Nobbo at Liverpool continually shove players off the pitch as the media doesn't highlight it and Klopp obviously gives them the nod to do it.
It will take a serious injury to an opposing player before the refs dare stop the Dippers from doing it
 
This is correct.
I remember Kane getting called out a few seasons back for looking at players then backing into them while they were high off the ground going for headers.
A very dangerous deliberate tactic by the big chinned wanker, but he stopped as a result of being called out.
Those 2 rats T-rent and Nobbo at Liverpool continually shove players off the pitch as the media doesn't highlight it and Klopp obviously gives them the nod to do it.
It will take a serious injury to an opposing player before the refs dare stop the Dippers from doing it
Really- ask Leroy Sane
 
I aggree, but the video shows the same contact between TAA and the forward. At no point was it shoulder to shoulder.

Both pen/red card for me.
If you give pen and send off one you have to give pen and send off the other, the inconsistency is the problem here!
We’re kidding ourselves if you don’t think LiVARpool get special treatment
 
It was a blatant push from behind from TAA, it's a clear and obvious foul. If that doesn't fall under their definition of clear and obvious, I've no idea what does. There's no debate, it's a penalty all day. Incompetence or worse are the only reasons it wasn't given.


Cancelo one was just as clear of a penalty, however I'm not really buying the red card.

He's given a red card under the "no attempt to play the ball" rule but a shoulder barge is a perfectly legal action, he's attempted a shoulder barge and got it wrong, if the shoulder barge is a fair and successful one, he gains control of the situation and the ball, therefore you cannot say there was no attempt to play the ball.
There was no attempt to play the ball. Had the shoulder charge worked, that would be irrelevant, but as it didn't work it's a red all day and every day. The rule for DOGSO is play the ball, not gain control of the ball
 
If you give pen and send off one you have to give pen and send off the other, the inconsistency is the problem here!
We’re kidding ourselves if you don’t think LiVARpool get special treatment
You can say the one yesterday should have been a pen but you can’t seriously say he prevented a goal scoring opportunity so it was a red card.. the spurs player was running the ball out of play
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.