'cos the twitcher is in there pocket's (literally) he sometime's like's to do his transfer dealing's through the press and give them snippet's of info like who was on the same flight as him going to Milan a few week's back!Dobsy87 said:They've spent just as much, possibly more, than City this window but apparently they aren't "ruining football" and "causing mayhem".
Could it be something to do with not wanting to upset dear sweet clean as a whistle 'nine-bob note' Harry?
charliebigspuds said:'cos the twitcher is in there pocket's (literally) he sometime's like's to do his transfer dealing's through the press and give them snippet's of info like who was on the same flight as him going to Milan a few week's back!Dobsy87 said:They've spent just as much, possibly more, than City this window but apparently they aren't "ruining football" and "causing mayhem".
Could it be something to do with not wanting to upset dear sweet clean as a whistle 'nine-bob note' Harry?
avoidconfusion said:The media is actually twisting it to make it look like we spent more than them although I am fairly sure we have not:
Defoe 16m
Keane 15m
Palacios 14m
Chimbonda 3.5m (?)
That's 47.5m spent , they also bought Defoe back for almost twice the amount they got for him from Portsmouth or something.
I also wonder how 15m for de Jong is obscene and 14m for Palacios is apparently fine. I am sorry but I happen to believe that de Jong is a MUCH better player than Palacios the dirty, diving cheat.
I believe we spent:
Bridge 10m
De Jong 15m
Bellamy 14m
Given 7m
That's 46m in total but obviously we are destroying football.