Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

[Mancio]

So basically the problems is one of semantics for Mancio ... in which case there isn't a problem. We've forgiven Mancio plenty of wooden semi literate phrases because we get the point. So the same applies to his Inter supporting friend.

Funnier still, if the conversation were about Mourinho no doubt Mancio would be shitting all over his CL win like a proper Inter supporter.

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:52 pm --

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

The final score was .... 0 - 3.

So the only "false" thing in his post is, as I say, a question of semantics rather than facts.

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse of a pitch invasion with referee's hunting is semantic in your mind ?

 

[Anonymous]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

 

[Mancio]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

 

[NipHolmes]

no way an inter fan would have wrote this.

this is more than enough to show that all the post is just a joke.

Hahahahahahaha. Get a bastard grip for fucks sakes.

What should he have written? 'We lost 3-0 in the second leg'? Still the same result, point out these facts then?

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

 

[Anonymous]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 20 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

 

[Mancio]

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:05 pm --

Hahahahahahaha. Get a bastard grip for fucks sakes.

What should he have written? 'We lost 3-0 in the second leg'? Still the same result, point out these facts then?

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

would a city fan get wrong something about a 6 years ago manchester derby ? no !!!!!

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

 

[Anonymous]

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:05 pm --

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

would a city fan get wrong something about a 6 years ago manchester derby ? no !!!!!

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini.

In two legged ties, the overall score in the one reported as that's the relevant and important one.

So we're blaming the referee for your 3 - 0 defeat to your rivals? Fair enough ... get your excuses in I'd expect nothing less.

Looking forward to you apologising to your Inter supporting friend though for falsely accusing him of lying when his post is factually correct.

 

[NipHolmes]

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

The results final though.
England were cheated by Maradona in 86' but the result stood.

You're fighting a losing battle here and your grasping. That post was on the money and you chose a technicality to rubbish it even though your wrong.

I have no problem with anybodyx but this is an underhanded tactic to 'win' a debate.

Your bias knows no boundaries.

 

[Anonymous]

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

He's stated facts which you can't dispute which is why your questioning his integrity. It's embarrassing for you because all those facts are easily verifiable.

 

[NipHolmes]

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

He's stated facts which you can't dispute which is why your questioning his integrity. It's embarrassing for you because all those facts are easily verifiable.

See no evil, hear no evil.

 

[bapi]

Fantastic article about EPL teams, agree 100%: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/511?cc=5739

 

[moomba]

Fantastic article about EPL teams, agree 100%: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/511?cc=5739

The fact that the author of that piece can't spot the tactics and strategies that go with either teams football is more down to his lack of knowledge than anything.

 

[Chippy_boy]

if he show an evidence to be an italian inter fan i will cut my cock . i swear.

He owes nothing to you and needs to prove nothing to nobody. His post was concise and factual and even if he wasn't an Inter fan it changes nothing anyway.

Get over yourself.

the fact is that his post is a lot of shit so full of falsehoods that even worth to read it.

You really are a berk aren't you.

 

[bapi]

Fantastic article about EPL teams, agree 100%: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/511?cc=5739

The fact that the author of that piece can't spot the tactics and strategies that go with either teams football is more down to his lack of knowledge than anything.

Well, his knowledge is actually very good. This is his website: http://www.zonalmarking.net/

But I understand that english fans won't like that article for ESPN.

 

[moomba]

Fantastic article about EPL teams, agree 100%: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/511?cc=5739

The fact that the author of that piece can't spot the tactics and strategies that go with either teams football is more down to his lack of knowledge than anything.

Well, his knowledge is actually very good. This is his website: http://www.zonalmarking.net/

But I understand that english fans won't like that article for ESPN.

He clearly doesn't have good knowledge about either team. I'm not English.

 

[NipHolmes]

I think Justin and his peashooter have departed in the taxi.

 

[Chippy_boy]

Fantastic article about EPL teams, agree 100%: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/blog/_/name/tacticsandanalysis/id/511?cc=5739

A lot of bullshit and clichés if I am honest.

"Team harmony has become forgotten when star players are involved – at least in England." - yada, yada, yada. And Yawn.

Do you see much disharmony in our team? Or United's for that matter? That's just nonsense.



 

[Davs 19]

I think Justin and his peashooter have departed in the taxi.

Yep well done Nip. A massive intellectual victory for Dismal, Billy and yourself. You must all be very proud.

 

[NipHolmes]

Mancio did this himself. That good post was rubbished wrongly and Mancio cannot accept he's wrong. He twisted a point to rubbish what was a great post which took time and effort.

He's the one out of order, another bigot on the board if you read his posts too.

 

[Blue Haze]

I've been reading an Inter forum for a while, and they say the same thing about Mancini. It's the generally accepted opinions on him from Inter fans.

Funny thing is, when he won the league they were all happy for him and proud that an Italian who managed Inter had won the PL. There are no hard feelings, they just didn't think he was a good enough manager.