sweynforkbeard
Well-Known Member
rickmcfc said:
Surely a cheap way for oceanographers to check this would be to monitor a large group of people farting in the bath? Ask people to supply their own model yachts - job's a good un.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
why this has been hushed of late
- Thread starter ali benarbia's studs
- Start date
Surely a cheap way for oceanographers to check this would be to monitor a large group of people farting in the bath? Ask people to supply their own model yachts - job's a good un.
des hardi said:rickmcfc said:They think it is something to do with gases beign released under the sea. When they release and a ship passes over it, the ship looses its boyancy.
logically making sense! plenty of experiments to support this!!!
but it still doesn t explain why "incidents" have stopped of late in modern times... why not continue as normal... we could have analyzed activity!?incidents have stopped... i think the last one was back in`97?!
bit odd!!!!!!
Des do you honestly not get it?? Incidents are continuing as NORMAL because that's all they ever were!! Normal incidents of ships and planes getting lost at sea.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
depps said:des hardi said:logically making sense! plenty of experiments to support this!!!
but it still doesn t explain why "incidents" have stopped of late in modern times... why not continue as normal... we could have analyzed activity!?incidents have stopped... i think the last one was back in`97?!
bit odd!!!!!!
Des do you honestly not get it?? Incidents are continuing as NORMAL because that's all they ever were!! Normal incidents of ships and planes getting lost at sea.
\o/
On a side note, this area is one of the busiest shipping routes in the world. It would be more surprising if there weren't slightly more incidents in this area than many others. As I said before though, statistically speaking, there is no difference.
Cheesy said:depps said:Des do you honestly not get it?? Incidents are continuing as NORMAL because that's all they ever were!! Normal incidents of ships and planes getting lost at sea.
\o/
On a side note, this area is one of the busiest shipping routes in the world. It would be more surprising if there weren't slightly more incidents in this area than many others. As I said before though, statistically speaking, there is no difference.
On another sidenote cheesey what does \o/ actually mean? Excuse me for my ignorance but i'm not very down with the internet lingo
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
depps said:Cheesy said:\o/
On a side note, this area is one of the busiest shipping routes in the world. It would be more surprising if there weren't slightly more incidents in this area than many others. As I said before though, statistically speaking, there is no difference.
On another sidenote cheesey what does \o/ actually mean? Excuse me for my ignorance but i'm not very down with the internet lingo
It's me holding my hands up cheering for your post.
Cheesy said:depps said:On another sidenote cheesey what does \o/ actually mean? Excuse me for my ignorance but i'm not very down with the internet lingo
It's me holding my hands up cheering for your post.
Cheers I'd always been curious about that one. Thought it might be cricket related or something..... :-)
ali benarbia's studs
Well-Known Member
do you not get it.....post ww2 an increased activity in the area resulted in nearly a thousands ships going missing...sometimes without a trace. then the activity stopped....as we were "spoonfed" all of the above answers(origional post!).
.... although this can happen any sea in the world.cape of good hope as an example..
it hasn t....for the media to claim it as weather/ufo`s/sea monster/spooks of atlantis....
with cuba being so close do you think military/naval exercises or experiments may have taken place during these over paranoid days?????? is that a more plausible explanation rather than the above
.... although this can happen any sea in the world.cape of good hope as an example..
it hasn t....for the media to claim it as weather/ufo`s/sea monster/spooks of atlantis....
with cuba being so close do you think military/naval exercises or experiments may have taken place during these over paranoid days?????? is that a more plausible explanation rather than the above
des where are you getting your info from? as cheesy has pointed out the official sources say that no more ships go missing in the bermuda triangle than any other part of the sea with a similar level of traffic? there is nothing 'strange' at all about ships disappearing there
sweynforkbeard
Well-Known Member
Cheesy said:depps said:On another sidenote cheesey what does \o/ actually mean? Excuse me for my ignorance but i'm not very down with the internet lingo
It's me holding my hands up cheering for your post.
I thought it was someone drowning and the Triangle had struck again.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
The incident that brought the myth of the Bermuda Triangle to the publics recognition was that of the disappearnce of Flight 19. Again though, the reality of the situation was that the flight merely got lost due to poor weather & inaccurate navigational aids. It is actually thought that although the flight flew through tis area, it actually disappeared somewhere else.
-- Wed May 19, 2010 4:45 pm --
LOL :-)
-- Wed May 19, 2010 4:45 pm --
sweynforkbeard said:Cheesy said:It's me holding my hands up cheering for your post.
I thought it was someone drowning and the Triangle had struck again.
LOL :-)