I’m due a ban so that’s fine...
you called my post pathetic, presumably for making a reference to City players getting the treatment at Palace last season, rather than agreeing with Zaha, yet you made the same reference a few pages back, Zaha is a serial diver and despite some of the tackles he endures, maybe the outcome would be more favourable to
him if he didn’t chuck himself on the floor at every opportunity... You accuse many on here of a pathetic City bias on contentious issues yet you seem to go out of your way to provoke a reaction by going in the opposite direction, no matter what,which is more pathetic in my opinion... Everyone has an opinion on a City forum, maybe if you were not so disparaging about comments you don’t agree with, you would not get so much negativity... On the other hand, maybe that’s what you crave ...??
It was your snipe at our game with them as a reason why Zaha cannot be frustrated with his treatment. You will see anyone who has complained about diving I haven't really had a problem with or responded to because I take that point and agree with it. He can be a pain in the arse to watch when he goes down easy and may be why refs are reluctant to give him every foul he deserves. From what I have seen I haven't seen him dive this season ( I may be wrong ) but I have seen him kicked all over the show. Players like him, Hazard, Sterling and the Silvas do need a lot more protection and instead of getting our knickers in a twist we should encourage players speaking out. What I do find sad is him being dismissed because his team mates (not even him) fouled us last year. I just don't get my head around that logic.