MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 18,265
Yes more than you believe
Lucky you.lolDamn I’ve got a GP appointment then
Simple really, the teachers just need to get an AI to review and grade the essaysWonder how schools will know if a student has written an essay or they just used AI ?
Could you push it to Monday please13th November 2026. Friday afternoon.
Hah we’re taking less than 5 years not 200 thoughDoes it matter?
This question has made me realise I really don’t give a toss about the long term (200+ years in the future) prospects of humanity.
I care about the world around me and the people in it today. I care about my children and their children and probably their children too, but I don’t think I can bring myself to care about 20 generations into the future any more than I care about relatives 20 generations back dying of bubonic plague etc.
Obviously I’d like for us to avoid this if possible and not embark on a deliberate attempt to end the species, I think we have a moral responsibility to look after the planet we’re on and not dig a hole for the future generations but god knows much of the planet would be much better off without us.
No one grieves for the Neanderthal. We are just another link in the evolutionary chain, eventually we will be replaced like all species before us.
Hah we’re taking less than 5 years not 200 though
They certainly areNo one's seriously talking about AI wiping us out in 5 years.
Computer says no.Could you push it to Monday please
Don’t worry they’ll cancel it way before thenDamn I’ve got a GP appointment then
What happens when the AI can invent a better AI than us though, it will increase exponentially and quick, shall we play a game!I think we're quite a long way away yet. Even today's AI such as ChatGPT isn't actually AI, it's just an algorithm which utilises the internet to formulate answers to questions. It cannot come up with new ideas or do anything that separates it from a very advanced version of Google.
They say the AI singularity is tied to processing power but I don't think that is really relevant. We're getting close to brain type levels of hardware and processing power but the software is a million miles off. Whilst computers are tied to 0's and 1's then we'll never see a true intelligence which isn't reliant or based upon human programming.
That doesn't mean we can't get AI and robots to do everything we need because do we really need an intelligent AI or do we actually just need far more powerful automation? I'd say the latter is best and the former is dangerous.
There is no guarantee that it can. AIs rate of development is still the result of human intelligence, not it's own. AI models require much more data to learn to the same level as a human, and that may always be the case.What happens when the AI can invent a better AI than us though, it will increase exponentially and quick, shall we play a game!
Get your phone to text the bloke at the next table and call him a ****how can AI start a fight in the pub?
Wrong film, that's the one with the little fella on the cycle that likes torturing people.What happens when the AI can invent a better AI than us though, it will increase exponentially and quick, shall we play a game!