MCFC-alan88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 9,618
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
So astute of you Bigga!
Bigga said:
So astute of you Bigga!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Will murray win wimbledon?/ serina appreciation society
- Thread starter davymcfc
- Start date
Bill
Moderator
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
no
no
der-bomber
Well-Known Member
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
Good, now he can go back to being a useless, obnoxious scotch twat ....
Good, now he can go back to being a useless, obnoxious scotch twat ....
Bluemoon115
Well-Known Member
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
Yes.
Yes.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
Thanks.
And some say I over analyse things...!!
MCFC-alan88 said:Bigga said:Not sure if he'll win myself. Roddick is a tough cookie to crack. Serves out big bomb aces and his serve and volley technique is pretty sound off the back of it.
Murray will make a game of it, but I think Roddick will win in four sets and probably two of those will be tie breaks(just a guess).
So, no, I don't think Murray will win it, this year. He's only 22, mind, so he has plenty of time on his side...
So astute of you Bigga!
Thanks.
And some say I over analyse things...!!
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
soaps are for saddosMCFC-alan88 said:aphex said:oh well, every cloud has a silver lining. time for emmerdale.
Emmerdale is like the smoke on the horizon, not a freaking silver lining, god soaps are shit.
Ntini77
Well-Known Member
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
I think he can still win it..................................
I think he can still win it..................................
Wrighty Wrexham
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 5,239
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
No he was the weakest link Goodbye!
No he was the weakest link Goodbye!
Re: Will murray win wimbledon?
He is a very good player but he won't be a great player.
His game just seems to be lacking that "special" ingredient; mindblowing consistency. Sampras had it, Borg had it, Federer has it. Murray doesn't.
He reminds me in some ways of McEnroe and Agassi in that they were often at the their best when the chips were down. It's just that they were better tennis players on the big occasion.
McEnroe seemed to go through this whole soap opera thing when he was at his peak. He would win a set or two and then would invariably lose the next, almost as if he had to do it to get angry at himself and pysche himself up. Then he would get it together again and play the most magnificent shots.
I can see that in Murray too, but he doesn't have the same ability to really turn a match around once it starts to get beyond him.
He is a very good player but he won't be a great player.
His game just seems to be lacking that "special" ingredient; mindblowing consistency. Sampras had it, Borg had it, Federer has it. Murray doesn't.
He reminds me in some ways of McEnroe and Agassi in that they were often at the their best when the chips were down. It's just that they were better tennis players on the big occasion.
McEnroe seemed to go through this whole soap opera thing when he was at his peak. He would win a set or two and then would invariably lose the next, almost as if he had to do it to get angry at himself and pysche himself up. Then he would get it together again and play the most magnificent shots.
I can see that in Murray too, but he doesn't have the same ability to really turn a match around once it starts to get beyond him.