Will Torres go down as...

LoveCity

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 Jan 2010
Messages
40,679
... the biggest flop in football history?

Kaka cost more at Real and hasn't worked out but has made some contributions between his injuries.

Veron of course tanked badly at United but his price tag was 20m less than Torres'.

Shevchenko also cost approximately 20m less than Torres and bombed hard in England but again price tag compared to Torres is important to consider.

Torres still has time to turn it around but everything about him suggests that he just isn't the same player anymore. The media continues to use excuses but they have been going on for around a year now - they used to say a lack of fitness, then a lack of confidence, now at Chelsea it rotates between confidence and not fitting in Chelsea's system yet. At what point do you draw the line and just say - he's not what he was.

Tonight's match was a perfect example to judge 2011 Torres. At his best, he made Vidic look like a Sunday league defender. Tonight he barely made Vidic (or anyone else) break a sweat. The closest was a single header that forced a save out of Van Der Sar.

Thank god we didn't sign him as many on here were clamouring for! Dzeko has hardly set the world on fire but he cost practically half, has more upside, and hasn't noticeably deteriorated from his time in Germany.
 
The price will obviously always be the main factor,however,our very own Robhino or RSC would give him decent competition.
 
LoveCity said:
... the biggest flop in football history?

I really hope so.
LoveCity said:
Kaka cost more at Real and hasn't worked out but has made some contributions between his injuries.
Yeah, I think you can only really judge him after he has a full pre/season with the team. I mean, would you really have declined the move if you were him?
LoveCity said:
Veron of course tanked badly at United but his price tag was 20m less than Torres'.
I'll get shouted down for this...but Chelsea lost more money on him than we did.
LoveCity said:
Shevchenko also cost approximately 20m less than Torres and bombed hard in England but again price tag compared to Torres is important to consider.
With the current inflation/climate, those two fees aren't as far apart as you might imagine. Awesome player...Square peg in a round hole at Chelsea.

LoveCity said:
Torres still has time to turn it around but everything about him suggests that he just isn't the same player anymore. The media continues to use excuses but they have been going on for around a year now - they used to say a lack of fitness, then a lack of confidence, now at Chelsea it rotates between confidence and not fitting in Chelsea's system yet. At what point do you draw the line and just say - he's not what he was.

It's mental. A few years ago, he was one of the best in the world. Looks decidedly ordinary in almost every game he plays in. Can anyone guess the last game he looked truly world class in? Yep...was against his current club.
 
there might be some truth to not fitting into Chelsea's system, though.

If he keeps this up he'll be a big bust, but he could come good next season with a new manager/new system.

Don't forget, Chelsea have less creativity and service in their midfield than even us.
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://hastorresscoredforchelsea.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://hastorresscoredforchelsea.com/</a>
 
FantasyIreland said:
The price will obviously always be the main factor,however,our very own Robhino or RSC would give him decent competition.
If we are going simply by the first half season, then NO. Robihno was fantastic for us.
 
FantasyIreland said:
The price will obviously always be the main factor,however,our very own Robhino or RSC would give him decent competition.

Are you serious?

Robi cost £32m and scored 15 goals for us.

Even RSC scored four goals for City; Torres, on current form, still has a long way to match that, let alone Robinho
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top