I thought she was one of our better players.Lol, Mary was poor in that match, what did you watch?
She certainly wasn't poor.
I thought she was one of our better players.Lol, Mary was poor in that match, what did you watch?
That's the one thing we don't seem to be though at the moment. Create so many chances but either snatch at them or just miss out in some other way. Bunny still thinks she has to be the one to get the goals all the time and sometimes there are better options available. We were the better footballing team today but Chelsea probably had more of the better opportunities to score. We need to get a lot more out of Roord and the way she's been playing recently I might be tempted to play Coombs in that position instead.I thought Chelsea were very lucky to get the win today, a clinical City would have buried them.
A cruel way to lose.
That really sums up our year - awful from Ouahbi that was a 60/40 tackle and she lost it.Then just unlucky. I hope this shows the women that Chelsea are not as good as everyone seems to think and have needed 2 errors to score today.
I agree - she has a very good left foot but her defending is at times comical. She seems like a really nice person but we need more than that!Ouahbi Is very poor. A genuine weak link.
I agree that Fowler is really talented. I also think she has the potential, if she keeps working hard, to become one of the world’s best. She was the best in the first half today. But I don’t think she should play next to Hasegawa. If anything, she should play next to Shaw in a front two. That could be devastating to many defensive lines. One reason for our plight is that some of our best players are playing out of their natural positions; a favorite strategy of our sacked genius, and I hope Cushing will start straightening things up. In my opinion, Hasegawa should play as attacking midfielder. She excels for Japan in that position. I know we now have Miedema and Roord (who should be benched), but I won’t be surprised that Hasegawa will do better than any of them as attacking midfielder. Another example is Aleixandri who should play as defensive or box to box midfielder, like what she does very well for Spain. She is obviously struggling as a central defender (particularly in Greenwood’s absence) because that is not natural for her. I guess when we start using our top players in their natural positions, we will improve significantly.Mary Fowler really is talented - maybe worth playing her alongside Yui as we are too easily pushed off the ball & without Alex don't have a player capable of winning 50/50's - that is the only difference in these two teams.
Positives are all our Japanese players and Mary.
We can beat these in the CL and WSL match.
We are far too top heavy in our squad balance. There are 8 players vying for the 4 attacking positions that we normally line up with and cases could be made for all of them being a starter. The link forward especially has Miedema, Fowler, Park and Roord all by itself meaning at least 2 play in a different position and the other misses out. Roord, I think is supposed to play as a #8 but I'm not sure whether she's not regained her fitness levels since her ACL injury or that she doesn't see herself as having defensive responsibilities..I agree that Fowler is really talented. I also think she has the potential, if she keeps working hard, to become one of the world’s best. She was the best in the first half today. But I don’t think she should play next to Hasegawa. If anything, she should play next to Shaw in a front two. That could be devastating to many defensive lines. One reason for our plight is that some of our best players are playing out of their natural positions; a favorite strategy of our sacked genius, and I hope Cushing will start straightening things up. In my opinion, Hasegawa should play as attacking midfielder. She excels for Japan in that position. I know we now have Miedema and Roord (who should be benched), but I won’t be surprised that Hasegawa will do better than any of them as attacking midfielder. Another example is Aleixandri who should play as defensive or box to box midfielder, like what she does very well for Spain. She is obviously struggling as a central defender (particularly in Greenwood’s absence) because that is not natural for her. I guess when we start using our top players in their natural positions, we will improve significantly.
Fujino, Prior, Yamashita and arguably Ouahabi were all better than Fowler.
I agree that Fowler is really talented. I also think she has the potential, if she keeps working hard, to become one of the world’s best. She was the best in the first half today. But I don’t think she should play next to Hasegawa. If anything, she should play next to Shaw in a front two. That could be devastating to many defensive lines. One reason for our plight is that some of our best players are playing out of their natural positions; a favorite strategy of our sacked genius, and I hope Cushing will start straightening things up. In my opinion, Hasegawa should play as attacking midfielder. She excels for Japan in that position. I know we now have Miedema and Roord (who should be benched), but I won’t be surprised that Hasegawa will do better than any of them as attacking midfielder. Another example is Aleixandri who should play as defensive or box to box midfielder, like what she does very well for Spain. She is obviously struggling as a central defender (particularly in Greenwood’s absence) because that is not natural for her. I guess when we start using our top players in their natural positions, we will improve significantly.