It’s the old “if you have two young sprinters for one spot in an Olympic development programme, both the same age, both the same pace in trials, one has perfect running form, the other has mediocre form, which do you pick” situation.Messi>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sergio
He's a far better and more productive player, but for how long?
If I have a 64 year old working for me who's a good bit better at his job than a 25 year old who's got the potential but lacks experience, which one do I invest my time in?
You pick the one with mediocre form and back yourself to fix it. I'm 8/9 years managing now and I'll always pick the kid with the higher ceiling and back myself to get him there.It’s the old “if you have two young sprinters for one spot in an Olympic development programme, both the same age, both the same pace in trials, one has perfect running form, the other has mediocre form, which do you pick” situation.
Tbh mate can't agree with that, I respect their work even if I don't always agree with their conclusions."We are CIES and we've written a spreadsheet which allows to put numbers in and get other numbers out. We then claim this is research and publish it to the unwary."
It's CIES, so it's clickbait for bottomfeeders.
Exactly, the same for me, though only 5 years managing kids.You pick the one with mediocre form and back yourself to fix it. I'm 8/9 years managing now and I'll always pick the kid with the higher ceiling and back myself to get him there.
You pick the one with mediocre form and back yourself to fix it. I'm 8/9 years managing now and I'll always pick the kid with the higher ceiling and back myself to get him there.
Tbh mate can't agree with that, I respect their work even if I don't always agree with their conclusions.