Would you report your neighbour

jma said:
Is this doctrine the reason why you didn't tell the inspectors about the bloke wanting at old women on your tram and slapped him on the back, with a "go on, my son" instead?

What about burglars shitting people up in their own home?

Muggers?

Flashers?

People shitting through church letterboxes?
Click to expand...
I don't know any burglars, muggers or flashers to grass them up.

As for the tram wanker, at 8am in the morning after a bus to town then tram into the southern badlands I never witnesses the under cloth shuffling, on heard the tale, it was the old dorris's jobs to call it in tbf.
 
urban genie said:
I don't know any burglars, muggers or flashers to grass them up.

As for the tram wanker, at 8am in the morning after a bus to town then tram into the southern badlands I never witnesses the under cloth shuffling, on heard the tale, it was the old dorris's jobs to call it in tbf.
Click to expand...

So by deduction you do know people who shit through church letterboxes?
 
Summerbuzz said:
Think carefully. Enforcing child poverty can seem like a good idea, I agree. But it's important to remember economic truths. First, that childhood poverty has life long debilitating effects.

The second economic truth is that of "Opportunity cost". Ask yourself, would dobbing this girl in cost you the opportunity to make more children more poor? After all, one should aim for the maximum return on the investment of your time and idle jealousy. In this case, that would be inflicting the most human misery and harm possible.

That suggests there is some other, greater evil that you could serve here. Could you not simply "accidentally" infect them with a nasty infectious disease that had long term debilitating consequences? Or perhaps traumatise them psychologically. Remember to escape from being held to account for your actions by employing a devious strategy of manipulation and 'gaslighting'.
Click to expand...
Hang on a second now, we haven't yet established that the OPs a tory.
 
Summerbuzz said:
Think carefully. Enforcing child poverty can seem like a good idea, I agree. But it's important to remember economic truths. First, that childhood poverty has life long debilitating effects.

The second economic truth is that of "Opportunity cost". Ask yourself, would dobbing this girl in cost you the opportunity to make more children more poor? After all, one should aim for the maximum return on the investment of your time and idle jealousy. In this case, that would be inflicting the most human misery and harm possible.

That suggests there is some other, greater evil that you could serve here. Could you not simply "accidentally" infect them with a nasty infectious disease that had long term debilitating consequences? Or perhaps traumatise them psychologically. Remember to escape from being held to account for your actions by employing a devious strategy of manipulation and 'gaslighting'.
Click to expand...
80C19E14-9463-4C68-933D-D246D86310CD.jpeg
 
Would you rather pay a few welfare people bending the rules or pay the cost of a prison stay?

Public sector Vs Contracted prisons £32k to £48k PA per prisoner

You choose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top