Would you report your neighbour

There’s a big difference between grassing on a child murderer and someone who ‘may’ be fiddling benefits. I’m sure you know that though.

Just sayin’
I don't disagree with your comment, but anonymous benefit fraud referrals can result in uncovering a wide range of other fraudulent activity. There is then less money for those that deserve and need support. This govt is not going down a good route with the removal of work capability assessments announced in the budget this week, potentially forcing those with health issues into unsuitable employment.

Mum of lady in Stockton who commiited suicide after benefits stopped in news today about review/appeal/inquest. Those claiming benefits when they are not entitled are depriving others and don't help address unacceptable activity by DWP
 
I would hope the snitches get stitches brigade are not referring to grassing on murderers/rapists etc, and only minor stuff. This supposed crime isn’t even proven so same goes

Yes, but what about people who wank at grannies on trains or shit through church letterboxes boxes?

The snitches get stitches brigade need to decide whether they want to assist the shitters and wankers in their escape or think they are scum of the earth and deserve porridge?
 
I haven’t read all of the debate/pages in this, and I expect the question has already been asked, but surely it boils down to this simple consideration;

Do they support the rags?

I’d have thought the opportunity to remove any rag from the general population should be taken, for the greater good, irrespective.
 
I haven’t read all of the debate/pages in this, and I expect the question has already been asked, but surely it boils down to this simple consideration;

Do they support the rags?

I’d have thought the opportunity to remove any rag from the general population should be taken, for the greater good, irrespective.
I'll refer you to the following post;
Think carefully. Enforcing child poverty can seem like a good idea, I agree. But it's important to remember economic truths. First, that childhood poverty has life long debilitating effects.

The second economic truth is that of "Opportunity cost". Ask yourself, would dobbing this girl in cost you the opportunity to make more children more poor? After all, one should aim for the maximum return on the investment of your time and idle jealousy. In this case, that would be inflicting the most human misery and harm possible.

That suggests there is some other, greater evil that you could serve here. Could you not simply "accidentally" infect them with a nasty infectious disease that had long term debilitating consequences? Or perhaps traumatise them psychologically. Remember to escape from being held to account for your actions by employing a devious strategy of manipulation and 'gaslighting'.
It would be a shame to throw away an opportunity to rid society of multiple rags just to get rid of only one.
 
I can see why people get more pissed off with a local benefits fraudster than the likes of Starbucks who don’t pay any tax in Britain.

Howard Schultz doesn’t live next door to you whereas the benefits cheat does so you see someone taking the piss and barely lifting a finger to rake in the money from the govt when you’re grafting like fuck just to get by, and you’re reminded of it every day when you leave for work and come home from work as they’ve had their feet up the whole time you’ve been on your feet doing a day’s work - you’re going to be more pissed off with that next door neighbour than the likes of Schultz.

But you’d have to be sure you know they’re doing wrong. Don’t be getting the authorities on someone when they’re actually working from home on something like selling sex toys and underwear online, which they wouldn’t want to broadcast to neighbours as their main source of income.

Even then, if the authorities were doing their jobs properly, they’d catch them anyway so you wouldn’t need to grass them up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top