Came across this article on Goal:
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896...r-citys-new-signings-can-help-abolish-roberto
The opening paragraph is the one relevant to this thread, as it reads:
The author of the article then goes on to make an argument that our new players should allow Mancini to be more attacking in these games by switching from this first 11 used in a 2-0 loss to Chelsea:
http://u.goal.com/139600/139685.jpg
To this first 11:
http://u.goal.com/139600/139687.jpg
I agree with the basic principle of the article in that I really think we need to be more attack minded if we have any chance of winning the league this season. Last season we took the approach of winning all the games against the small teams and playing for draws in the big games. This strategy partially worked, as we would have finished first in the league had we only played teams in the bottom half as seen here:
http://stats.football365.com/2011/ENG/PR/vbothalf.html
We would've finished 8th if we only played teams that finished in the top half last season:
http://stats.football365.com/2011/ENG/PR/vtophalf.html
So what do you think fellow Blues? Do you agree with this article's premise? If not, what would be your starting 11 in games against the "Top Six" clubs? Would it be different home vs away?
NOTE: To keep it realistic/challenging, you can only use current MCFC players and not "expected" transfers (ie: Nasri/Sneijder).
My starting 11 would be:
.......................Hart.......................
Micah.........VK......Lescott........Clichy
...............Barry.......NDJ..................
......................Yaya.......................
.....Aguero..........................Silva.....
..................Dzeko/Balo...................
Using Clichy to be more attacking with NDJ on his side to cover defensively.
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896...r-citys-new-signings-can-help-abolish-roberto
The opening paragraph is the one relevant to this thread, as it reads:
In the 10 league matches against the other teams that make up the Premier League’s ‘big six’ last season, Manchester City won only three and failed to score in four. By erring on the side of caution, City picked up two points out of a possible 15 away to the teams whose exalted company they have so rapidly found themselves in.
The author of the article then goes on to make an argument that our new players should allow Mancini to be more attacking in these games by switching from this first 11 used in a 2-0 loss to Chelsea:
http://u.goal.com/139600/139685.jpg
To this first 11:
http://u.goal.com/139600/139687.jpg
I agree with the basic principle of the article in that I really think we need to be more attack minded if we have any chance of winning the league this season. Last season we took the approach of winning all the games against the small teams and playing for draws in the big games. This strategy partially worked, as we would have finished first in the league had we only played teams in the bottom half as seen here:
http://stats.football365.com/2011/ENG/PR/vbothalf.html
We would've finished 8th if we only played teams that finished in the top half last season:
http://stats.football365.com/2011/ENG/PR/vtophalf.html
So what do you think fellow Blues? Do you agree with this article's premise? If not, what would be your starting 11 in games against the "Top Six" clubs? Would it be different home vs away?
NOTE: To keep it realistic/challenging, you can only use current MCFC players and not "expected" transfers (ie: Nasri/Sneijder).
My starting 11 would be:
.......................Hart.......................
Micah.........VK......Lescott........Clichy
...............Barry.......NDJ..................
......................Yaya.......................
.....Aguero..........................Silva.....
..................Dzeko/Balo...................
Using Clichy to be more attacking with NDJ on his side to cover defensively.