steviemc
Well-Known Member
I'm with Damocles on this point. You can't change democracy just when it suits your whimsical self. We've seen this attitude taken apart recently - and good for it. Those abhorrent people (and I'm not suggesting you're one of these) that have a rather self-important snobberish belief that democracy works 'only as long as it agrees with me', is disgusting. It's about time this attitude was killed off."fair and democratic elections can never be wrong". I'm not sure whether this is frightening or just daft (discuss in relation to the Irish election in 1918, or whether the US electoral college is "fair").
I think you've mixed up de jure and de facto, but are you really suggesting that a democratically-elected but nasty leader (Hitler, Trump, Erdogan, Putin) is to be preferred to a benevolent dictatorship (not that there have been many)? Does getting elected make them not nasty?
You reckon the system (democracy?) is right - having just quoted a peace settled by Kennedy and Krushchev (a great democrat).
The sooner this condescending ilk realise that they're only a little blot on the landscape of millions of others, the better. There are millions of others whose opinions may differ from yours or mine, yet their knowledge and understanding is just as valid. It's about time this attitude of 'I accept democracy - but not from people I don't think are as intelligent as me' is fucked off once and for all.
Vic, I sincerely hope you don't fall into this bracket - but if you do - then my comments apply to you as well.
Last edited: