But why did he have to add that City are lucky to have him? I'm sure that's not something he'd say about other players.Murphy was waxing lyrical about Jesus said he's the best young player he has seen since a young Messi.The media bias narrative I agree with at times but is definitely blown way out of proportion by a lot of blues,I've seen nothing but the highest of praises today from the media pundits etc.
I would take that as a compliment tbh,"that we are lucky to have him"..literally nothing in that comment lol,this is what I mean about people getting too carried away with the perceived anti city agenda lol.But why did he have to add that City are lucky to have him? I'm sure that's not something he'd say about other players.
Under the radar is a fine place to be. People watch MOTD and ultimately will make their own minds up.Just nipped on to sky sports news.... top 10 trending articles...
Klopp, Mourinho x 2or 3, Wenger, Pochitiono (sp), Conte, Lewis Hamilton Nothing about City.
No I'm asking myself, us this a good or a bad thing?
Bad in that City get no on air promotion or coverage, or good in that no City fans can be arsed to engage with the corrupt Bankers (so again)!
And I take it as meaning he doesn't think a player of his quality should be at City. I'm not talking about an anti City agenda, just a bitter Scouse pundit with previous formI would take that as a compliment tbh,"that we are lucky to have him"..literally nothing in that comment lol,this is what I mean about people getting too carried away with the perceived anti city agenda lol.