Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
Now you've put it like that ;)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Might have saved a few being gassed to death mind, it's fucked up over there and i've got no idea of the answerIt is 4 civilians dead.
Shame on you for supporting this do you not learn anything from our past mistakes?
Len Rum
Well-Known Member
No need to mate.Any Russian retaliation yet?
If you make it your usual binary winners and losers scenario then Assad and Ruskis have won.
Bit of gesture bombing today.
But game over now.
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
Juice.No need to mate.
If you make it your usual binary winners and losers scenario then Assad and Ruskis have won.
Bit of gesture bombing today.
But game over now.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Juice.
you mean deuce?
It is 4 civilians dead.
Shame on you for supporting this do you not learn anything from our past mistakes?
Shame on you for supporting the use of chemical weapons
Ricster
Well-Known Member
This for me is the question that needs answered.Yes, it would make a nice change. It feels like some are either unable or unwilling to do that though.
Back on topic, why didn’t they wait for the OPCW findings before launching an attack?
Around 12 hours after the bombing the inspectors were due. Surely if you want to prove to the world and give the world evidence you would not destroy a chemical facility.
Maybe the 3 nations involved were helping the Syrian people. What are the chances of Assad dropping another chemical attack on his own people again in those 12 hours with the OPCW due (highly unlikely, if indeed it was him with the original attack (Likely).
Maybe there is something or someone on the inside they were trying to protect?
But back to that question. Why destroy eveidence with inspectors due?
newfaceinhell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 476
This for me is the question that needs answered.
Around 12 hours after the bombing the inspectors were due. Surely if you want to prove to the world and give the world evidence you would not destroy a chemical facility.
Maybe the 3 nations involved were helping the Syrian people. What are the chances of Assad dropping another chemical attack on his own people again in those 12 hours with the OPCW due (highly unlikely, if indeed it was him with the original attack (Likely).
Maybe there is something or someone on the inside they were trying to protect?
But back to that question. Why destroy eveidence with inspectors due?
Why indeed.
bumbleblue
Well-Known Member
The inspectors were going to the place the alleged chemicals were used for verification not the place bombed where they were allegedly made.Why indeed.
The chemical weapons attack was staged by the UK I believe the Russians when they say they have evidence. Our media of course will never publish this evidence.Shame on you for supporting the use of chemical weapons
Our government lied about the ex-spy being poisoned and they are lying about the chemical attack.
The video was provided to us by a group linked to ISIS that the UK and Saudi's fund in fact the same group had links to the Manchester Arena attack so if you are supporting this illegal war then you're supporting the very people that killed our children.