Yeah.
It's always a pain in the arse when people ask for actual evidence and do things like critically think about the nuts and bolts of your theories rather than accepting them at face value.
You know nothing of politics and as for being a member of the Labour Party?
Just wander over to Wikipedia if you know so little....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tory
(Toryism) based on a British version of traditionalism and conservatism, which upholds the supremacy of social order as it has evolved throughout history.
The supremacy of social order as it has evolved throughout history. What does that mean? And how can it be justified? It means that the stratification of society has a genetic or behavioural aspect to it, the great unwashed are genetically predisposed to occupy the lower rungs of the social ladder and poor breeding keeps them there, as their poor life choices are passed on to their progeny.
Take this view and project it beyond these shores and it is the justification for racism, both wanton and patronising.
So Boris sees those poor black faces of the third world, those smiling piccaninnies with their watermelon smiles (when of course they're not shooting each other in black ghettoes) and it reinforces his view that it is the white man's burden to do right by them, after all they're like children, they need our guidance.
The Tory party is rife with this shit, their entire political philosophy is based on only two things, the justification of their own power and the moral case for greed.