COVID-19 — Coronavirus

Status
Not open for further replies.
No it isn’t.
This is the first blanket indemnity.
They are not commonly given at all.
This is why


Not going to argue with you again
 
Joint Committee on Vaccination’s recommended priority list for vaccination programme published on Sky.
If this is implemented most posters on here won’t be seeing a vaccine any time soon!

  1. Older adults' resident in a care home and care home workers
  2. All those 80 years of age and over and health and social care workers
  3. All those 75 years of age and over
  4. All those 70 years of age and over
  5. All those 65 years of age and over
  6. High-risk adults under 65 years of age
  7. Moderate-risk adults under 65 years of age
  8. All those 60 years of age and over
  9. All those 55 years of age and over
  10. All those 50 years of age and over
  11. Rest of the population (priority to be determined)
cheers...
 
Not sure if serious

Perfectly serious. You vaccinate the ones most likely to die if they catch it - starting with the most vulnerable and. We have known for ages pretty much what that means.

Of course you need experts to deploy and fit individual vaccines to each group if we have multiple but you do not need a debate to save lives. You vaccinate them in order of likelihood to catch it and die.

Not arguing there should have been no discussion. Of course there should. But the order of priority is hardly a secret. Its self evident.
 
Perfectly serious. You vaccinate the ones most likely to die if they catch it - starting with the most vulnerable and. We have known for ages pretty much what that means.

Of course you need experts to deploy and fit individual vaccines to each group if we have multiple but you do not need a debate to save lives. You vaccinate them in order of likelihood to catch it and die.

Not arguing there should have been no discussion. Of course there should. But the order of priority is hardly a secret. Its self evident.
Everything has to be decided properly by the relevant bodies , it has to be discussed like anything else , risk v benefit is always discussed
 
Perfectly serious. You vaccinate the ones most likely to die if they catch it - starting with the most vulnerable and. We have known for ages pretty much what that means.

Of course you need experts to deploy and fit individual vaccines to each group if we have multiple but you do not need a debate to save lives. You vaccinate them in order of likelihood to catch it and die.

Not arguing there should have been no discussion. Of course there should. But the order of priority is hardly a secret. Its self evident.

I am not sure what the issue is here. There is so much you could attack the process and decision making for, this is just weird.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.