PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[bennyboy]

Hope some of the bottom clubs take epl to court over the Everton second points deduction.

 

[Dribble]

Hope some of the bottom clubs take epl to court over the Everton second points deduction.

It would certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons if they did. It's at that point I reckon you'd begin to see the break-up of the PL, with the Red Top Mafia & Spuds & a couple of obedient hangers on, on one side, a couple of abstainees in the middle & the rest going to war with the PL fearing they'll be next for sanctions, or having their PL status threatened through not being able to invest to compete to keep their to flight status.

 

[give it to gordon]

Said it earlier I'm surprised Newcastle, Forest Everton aren't getting together to fit this in court

 

[cheekybids]

CAS found that in City's case there was no smoke and no fire.

Although there was a bunch of cunts seen pointing & shouting “fire!”

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

Any club (except us of course) can be expelled from the league and wound up if found guilty of PSR or any other financial rules as far as I'm concerned. That's how supporters work and on that basis I'd expect fans of other clubs to want the same for us.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Does anyone have an answer that kills the "no smoke without fire" argument? I mean aside from the obvious!

View attachment 113414

No smoke without fire ffs. It’s the most idiotic expression in the English language.

 

[mrbelfry]

City have been accused by the PL of breaching P&S regulations for seasons 2015/16, 2016/17, and 2017/18. 25 rule breaches across those three seasons.

Ha yeah I said the big problem is ignorance :)

I can't be bothered checking to see how the rules are different now compared to then though. I think the club reported profit in all those years so I guess the allegation is once we remove the disguised owner investment via sponsorship then we'd have breached those rules or something

 

[Ballymagash Blue]

Ha yeah I said the big problem is ignorance :)

I can't be bothered checking to see how the rules are different now compared to then though. I think the club reported profit in all those years so I guess the allegation is once we remove the disguised owner investment via sponsorship then we'd have breached those rules or something

Yes. If the alleged owner investment accusations fall then so will the alleged P&S breaches. The alleged breaches are all interconnected.

 

[mattcity5]

No smoke without fire ffs. It’s the most idiotic expression in the English language.

It's fine, as long as those shouting 'fire' don't have any possible ulterior motives.

 

[oakiecokie]

It looks like that waster Aldridge has been on the lash again.

Dick head and another fucker who doesn`t understand how and why this particular case will take so long.
We have not been pinching a Mars bar but the biggest so called "charges" in the history of the English Football.
I would have thought a Scouser would have understood this, seeing they are well versed on the law.