2022/2023 Accounts - Record Revenues & Profit - Annual Report

[remember arthur mann]

Goodness knows where we'd be without FFP, we might have gone under. Won't be long now until the Sheiky gets bored and 'does one'.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Yea 32.7% more seats but 61.9% more revenue.
I think they have more corporate seats though and charge more for them.

Plus they have more daytrippers than us so they sell much more merchandise, food, and drinks on matchdays. It is also much easier to buy food and drink in their crumbling stadium (non-corporate) than it is at City where we don't have enough outlets in the packed upper tiers of the East and West stands.

 

[Champions again in 2012]

Here you go

That is hilarious

 

[Shirley]

Prize money earned over the years must be a tidy sum…

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Here you go

Saw that a few days ago. I thought it was very funny but a lot of BM posters were getting a little upset.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Here you go

Paddy Power’s tweets can be really funny and quite satirical at times.

Linking 115 charges, that go up to about 5 years ago, to our current financial year is a bit lazy, but then it’s for the uninformed fans to lap up, I guess. It’s just a file in their MCFC FFP folder.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Plus they have more daytrippers than us so they sell much more merchandise, food, and drinks on matchdays. It is also much easier to buy food and drink in their crumbling stadium (non-corporate) than it is at City where we don't have enough outlets in the packed upper tiers of the East and West stands.

Food and merchandise sales are irrelevant in the main. Well, for City, anyway. Puma get the vast majority of our merchandise sales and whoever contracts the stadium food and drink the profits from that.

We get a flat fee per season, plus maybe a small % of profits too.

Maybe the rags get more at the moment.

 

[remember arthur mann]

Interesting that their match day revenue is almost double ours and yet their attendances compare to ours in no way reflects that. We also have far more hospitality seats/packages than them. So surely this means that they are charging more? Despite the ongoing moans from our fans on ticket prices. (Unless this includes club shop sales and they are just selling more shirts etc, or is that purely reported in retail revenue?)

Something dodgy going on at the swamp which needs investigating.

 

[Blackley_Blue]

I see this bellend has took it well, like clockwork all these journo's

Like the Pied Piper for all the crying cunts.

 

[lefty goldblatt]

Wanker Wallace of the Telegraph isn't taking this very well

Profits of £80.4 million and a treble of Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League – Manchester City should be the poster boys for English football but instead they are in the kind of legal collision with authorities that will define the game for a generation.

The announcement that the club doubled its profits in the season that it signed Erling Haaland and won everything does not change the severity of the fight it faces. The 115 charges for allegedly breaking financial fair play – now profit and sustainability rules (PSR) – and a range of other offences is absorbing huge resources on both sides. The Premier League is in the fight of its life. Meanwhile, City’s 19 fellow clubs wait on the sidelines – without any updates on the case’s progress.

“The greatest football and commercial year of its storied history,” was how chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak described 2022-23 for the club. Fourteen years after Sheikh Mansour bought a mid-table Premier League team in some financial distress and with a tendency to self-sabotage, the transformation is complete. At what cost, we are yet to find out. It is unclear exactly how much of the Abu Dhabi royal’s fortune it has taken to elevate City to treble-winning profit-machine. But as with other clubs in a similar position – Chelsea in the 2000s, Paris Saint-Germain – it is a big number.

City have posted the highest ever revenue