Weloveyoucitywedo said:
You talk as if logic is the only intelligence, anyone who has ever recovered from depression or anxiety for example knows you have to switch off the logic and use your emotional intelligence to deal with whatever the issue is.
You say arguing against logic is asisnine, that's only because from the age of 4 you've been through a dogmatic western education system that ONLY teaches logic, certainly when you go to university, logic is all that's taught. sadly in my opinion.
As city fans, we don't use logic. If we did we'd all be United fans. Logically there is no reason whatsoever for any of us to support city. When i was growing up United we're the best team in england, arguably the world, whilst we we're in division 3, if i'd used logic i'd go to watch united, but like most people on here I had an emotional attachment to City so that would overide any logical thought and i'm glad it did. Supprting city in itself is a logical fallacy but i'm sure we're all glad that we do.
COuld we prove we have an emotional/spiritual bond with city? No, we couldn't, but we all know it's true.
Only when you pull away from logic can science move forward, I would advise you to be a bit more open to new ideas and not base your opinions on your university indoctornation.
Remember, all logic is, is things that you've learned from other people, nothing more.
I also think dawkins is a genius, by going agaisnt the grain of british society he has made millions.
Your whole precise that logic is somehow a thing you learn from other people, is just wrong. If I were born and left on an island by myself, I would still develop logical skills, if we met aliens from a distant civilisation, they would use logic in much the same way we do. Logic is a product of the universe we live and how beings like ourselves can make sense of it. We're not even the only animals on earth that use logic.
You say that this is because I've been through a Western education system which 'indoctrinated me', which is interesting because I actually was home schooled for much of my childhood because I was very ill. I taught myself by reading widely, anything and everything. You also use the example of 'switching off the logic' and using emotional intelligence to help get over depression. Which is a contradiction in and of itself. By switching off 'what you see to be logical' you are benefiting from it which instantly makes it a 'logical' thing to do. Emotions are complex, but ultimately they have been crafted to benefit humans in wider society and allow them to succeed.
Being a City fan to me was an entirely logical decision, I was taken to watch them by my uncle, my dad and my cousin. Now what is the most socially beneficial thing to do when you're in that situation as an eight-year-old? Support the other team? No, you see, humans are tribal creatures and we like being part of something in a social context, because it is/was beneficial to our evolution. It's certainly not a logical fallacy to support City, and this indicates to me that you have an overly simplified view of what the logic in these systems implies.
You seem to think that our emotional intelligence can't be logical because logic is 'simplistic, cold and mechanical'. If you ask me, you're thinking about it all wrong, the logic which drives our emotions is so complex it is beautiful, and it is something to be marvelled at and not simply written off as being something 'supernatural and unexplainable'. The reason that scientists have become less spiritual over the years is because science itself has transcended into the realm of the fantastical, we don't need gods to be amazed by things any more, we see that the universe itself is an amazing place to be.
When you say 'be open to new ideas', you haven't actually proposed anything new other than 'not everything can be explained by empirical logic'. Well then, if you don't explain things via that then propose something which is better and we will use that. Until then all you've done is derided science without actually proposing anything better.