City are in trouble, according to this fountain of knowledge..

[Rolee]

So the North Stand expansion may be put on the back burner for a bit, ah well. Good thing we got the CFA built and the SS expansion done already.

Am I right in thinking that the Etihad deal accounts for only around 10% of our total annual revenue?

 

[Patientman63]

Raidong their players has left a ladting scare that woll never heal.

Cant argue with that.

 

[shevtheblue]

Do we need to sully the pages of BM with rantings of arses fans

Gave you a laugh though, didn't it :)

 

[Jackford]

Guess we just need a better kit deal to make up for the huge loss.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

Gave you a laugh though, didn't it :)

Its that funny I reckon Atwood was responsible for Labours manifesto as well.

 

[Kinkys Left Foot]

Has this **** not read our Financial reports for the last 2 years.
I thought at a guess around 35 million a year was the Etihad sponsorship deal - last 2 years turnover £351,766,000 - less than 10% and £391,744,000 - 8.9%
If Etihad rolled over belly up (highly unlikely) does he really not think we could replace the sponsorship deal tomorrow with a glut of companies who would be falling over themselves to sponsor City.
Fuck me these Gooners are desperate.

 

[kaz7]

Gave you a laugh though, didn't it :)

I may have lol'd a lttle ;)

 

[WyongBlue]

Wasted 5mins reading it, they have the Emirates Stadium don't they :)

 

[Akai]

so we will never find shirt sponsors if Etihad stops sponsoring the club?

ok

 

[asahartford1]

Wasted 5mins reading it, they have the Emirates Stadium don't they :)

Yes but he has wasted a couple of days writing it.