There appear to be 14 fielders including one with no clothes on.
Is this symptomatic of overcrowding?
The ethnicity of the cricketers can be discussed another day.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
That would take some serious amount of Lego bricks.It could be solved by making better use of the available volume.
Yes but the queues for the bogs in the morning would be lengthy.It could be solved by making better use of the available volume.
MellowJoe
Well-Known Member
Why are we fucking about with ideas of colonizing Mars again.. If we all lived in 1 building, I reckon the human species would last minutes. Not that that'd be a bad thing.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 18,931
I'm by no means an expert, but for what it's worth. Giving tenants more rights in rental properties would be a start. Legally limit the amount that landlords are allowed to increase rent and make it extremely difficult to kick out tenants who pay their rent on time. This will reduce the demand for property, because rental is a realistic long-term solution, like it is in Germany. Secondly, limit the ability of foreign investors/embezzlers to buy property in places where there is a limited supply. There's no reason why we should allow some corrupt Russian or Chinese businessman to store their money in empty London property while British people are struggle to find a place to live. And obviously build more housing, particularly social housing, but I can't help but think that long-term, we need to have an economy where all of the jobs aren't in London and the South East. Again, something a bit more like Germany's federal system.
The first suggestion is never going to happen because half of the Tory bench make money from renting out property. For the same reason, they have very little interest in property values going down, and so have no motivation to stop foreign investors pushing prices up either. So other than a bit of lip service and a minimal council house building project, I can't see much changing. Grenfell Tower will be an interesting one, because at some point it will be demolished. Who's betting that it will be replaced at least partly with expensive, luxury flats?
The first suggestion is never going to happen because half of the Tory bench make money from renting out property. For the same reason, they have very little interest in property values going down, and so have no motivation to stop foreign investors pushing prices up either. So other than a bit of lip service and a minimal council house building project, I can't see much changing. Grenfell Tower will be an interesting one, because at some point it will be demolished. Who's betting that it will be replaced at least partly with expensive, luxury flats?
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Caravans and tents.
Tuearts right boot
Well-Known Member
Sod that, get a Yurt.