flb
Well-Known Member
I agree that next season will still have a transitional element to it but if Pep is the guy I think he is, every season he is here will see some sort of transition in the team as he constantly tries to improve it and move towards his vision of how the game should be played (in the Premier League). With each passing season, we should be closer to the goal and therefore the transitional element will decline. I hope next season will be rather less of a transition than this one but I feel as though there might be one or two big changes to come in how we play and there ought to be several new players to bed in.
Transitional shouldn't mean we can't win things but it complicates things. I thought we would do better this season and I will always believe that if KDB had put us two up against Chelsea, we would at least have made more of a fight of it, as we would if Vinnie and Gundogan had been fit and available; although Gundogan's absence was ameliorated somewhat by Yaya's re-emergence.
I do concur that three years is not going to be a long enough tenure for Pep to do the job and I hope he signs an extension - soon.
Your last paragraph sums up totally what will happen to City on the pitch for the next ten years , 3 seasons is nowhere near enough for the guidance needed to turn us into anything like a club to be taken seriously in European football let alone the PL.Pep needs to state his intentions pretty quickly and put the uncertainty well and truly to bed. If he stays for just three seasons then you have to really question why the fuck did we wait all these years for him? Soriano saying that he only sees a managers term being only effective for 3/4 years worrys me- that's great at a club like Barca who employ from within after decades of success but we don't have that. Here's hoping Pep leaves a legacy at City like Cruyff did at Barca-it without doubt can't be implemented in three seasons.