You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool Post Match Thread
- Thread starter Blue Smarties
- Start date
Was the advantage to Liverpool and the foul on Sagna by any chance...Or where a City player was fouled and he played advantage even when there was clearly none.
I know it could be considered a soft one but there was definitely enough contact made for us to have been given the free kick in that incident. I had a feeling we were going to get very little after that.
dennishasdoneit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 May 2008
- Messages
- 10,210
- Team supported
- Manchester City FC.
Did anyone notice the news at ten on saturday night , the headlines , BONG terrorists take hostages BONG putin and blair in talks BONG Liverpool beat Man.City , nice to see the result had so much importance , it must be the dippers year again :)
The headline shud have gone..BONG! red scouse move up the league from 10th to 9 th place as klopp revolution gathers pace.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
No. I think it was in the first half and there was a foul on a City player just in the Liverpool half. So most of the Liverpool players were behind the ball yet he played advantage, when a free-kick would have been a far greater advantage to us.Was the advantage to Liverpool and the foul on Sagna by any chance...
I know it could be considered a soft one but there was definitely enough contact made for us to have been given the free kick in that incident. I had a feeling we were going to get very little after that.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Not making excuses but wasn't there a foul on one of our players in the lead-up to their first goal?
Yeah, I remember that one. I know the ref wasn't to blame for the defeat but he certainly didn't help our cause. He's an absolutely terrible referee.No. I think it was in the first half and there was a foul on a City player just in the Liverpool half. So most of the Liverpool players were behind the ball yet he played advantage, when a free-kick would have been a far greater advantage to us.
Newquayblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 793
haha - nuff said.Nah, replying to your own post is worse...
:-)haha - nuff said.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Not making excuses but wasn't there a foul on one of our players in the lead-up to their first goal?
Baccers was only gonna get a foul if Billy Liddell had kicked him. Mossman decided that course of action on Thursday.
Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
Watched it a few times. Don't reckon it was a foul tbh. They may often be given in those situations when a player goes down under little or no contact but the truth is he was just caught in possession and went down far too easily.Not making excuses but wasn't there a foul on one of our players in the lead-up to their first goal?